1 Corinthians 1:24 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
The power and wisdom of God is not the divinity of Christ as such but the preaching of the cross.
1 Corinthians 1:28 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul uses the expression "things that are not" differently here from the way he uses it in his epistle to the Romans. Here it means simply that which is vile and contemptible, as opposed to "things that are," which are beautiful, powerful and respected.
1 Corinthians 1:29 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Boasting, even if it is of good works, harms the soul of the boaster. Anyone who boasts of worldly achievements is highly worldly himself.
1 Corinthians 2:7 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
By wisdom Paul means the cross and the whole dispensation of salvation.
1 Corinthians 3:9 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul calls us God's fellow workers, not his servants or slaves.
1 Corinthians 3:16 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
The one who believes in Christ receives the Holy Spirit, who dwells in him by the washing of rebirth, and thus he is spiritual. But if such people then turn around and serve worldly passions, in that respect they are carnal. Paul says that those who have become spiritual according to their confession of faith may nevertheless still live as though they were carnal so as to become an insult to the Holy Spirit who dwells in them.
1 Corinthians 5:5 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
This is not to be taken literally. What Paul means is that the person concerned should be put out of the church and forced to live in the world, which is ruled by Satan. That way he will learn to fear God and escape the greater punishment that is to come.
1 Corinthians 6:1 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul did not want them to be judged by outsiders because he did not want the shortcomings of those who had been taught propriety and righteousness to become a scandal to those outside the church.
1 Corinthians 6:15 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
You are all members of Christ because you have been united to him by being born again of the Spirit. You have the hope that you will rise again, just as he rose.
1 Corinthians 7:17 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
It is wrong to suppose that the circumstances which prevailed when a person was converted stand in the way of his becoming holy.
1 Corinthians 7:18 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
It is not possible to replace flesh which has been cut off in this way, although the blessed Epiphanius of Cyprus says that it is. Those who want to know more about the subject can consult what he has to say about it.
1 Corinthians 8:5 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul says "so-called" here because he is showing that they do not really exist.
1 Corinthians 9:21 — Pauline Commentary from the Greek Church
Paul states, somewhat surprisingly, that he is under the law of Christ, lest anyone think that he is under the law of Moses.
1 Corinthians 9:26 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
The "air" here refers to the powers of evil.
1 Corinthians 10:2 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
The sea is a figure of baptism with water; the cloud of the grace of baptism in the Spirit.
1 Corinthians 10:3 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul calls the food supernatural because it gave those who ate it the power of the Holy Spirit. However, it did not of itself make them spiritual people.
1 Corinthians 13:13 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul tells the Corinthians that love is the greatest of all because there was jealousy and strife among them, and the church was in danger of being divided.
1 Corinthians 15:14 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Forgiveness of sins comes through the resurrection.
1 Corinthians 15:39 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
In the resurrection a better body is constructed, one which is no longer flesh and blood as such but which is an immortal and indestructible living being.
1 Corinthians 15:56 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
By "law" here Paul simply means either what inheres in the flesh or what is added to it. His point is that sin is taken away along with death and that the law ceases to exist once we have become immortal and are governed by the grace of the Spirit.
1 Samuel 3:3 — EXPOSITIONS ON PSALMS, PSALM 10
It says "The Lord is in his holy temple," as if it had been appropriate to say "The Lord is his help." For the Lord's name alone is commonly inserted as an indication of assistance. But here the psalmist intends to indicate that there is one who lives in the temple and is used for defense and protection, in whom it is able to stand firm securely in hope against all treachery. But what it calls the temple is the tabernacle in which the ark of God was placed, for the temple had not yet been built. That the tabernacle may be called the temple, the testimony of Kings [Samuel] clearly instructs, since the construction of the temple had not begun at the time: "And Samuel was lying down in the temple of God, in which the ark of God was located."
1 Thessalonians 1:5 — COMMENTARY ON 1 THESSALONIANS
For you know, he says, how you came to be chosen (that is, how you arrived at faith), for you did not believe solely by means of our words. Indeed, we not only spoke but also showed wonders, great and glorious and worked by the Spirit, by which you were strengthened with regard to the things we had spoken to you. Hold on tightly to what you have learned, and don't be deflected from your course by the external things that happen to you.
1 Thessalonians 3:3 — COMMENTARY ON 1 THESSALONIANS
Paul says that Timothy is coming to strengthen the Thessalonians with his words, stabilizing the thinking of the Thessalonians by his presence with them, lest they collapse under the weight of their tribulations. Paul describes this collapsing as a "commotion," being caught up in the passions of your persecutors.
1 Timothy 1:4 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
Paul here discourses about the common theme of all of his letters written to those converted from the Gentiles. He does this to point out that often things said by converts from Judaism may undermine the genuine piety of Gentile converts. In the case of the Galatians, he found that they were observing things required by the law, including especially the rite of circumcision. He pointed out that the use of genealogies was a particularly bad practice, because it made it possible for Jews to argue that Christ was not the promised offspring of Abraham and David and thereby throw into confusion Gentiles who are not well grounded in the Scriptures. He calls these genealogies "endless" because they can be turned in a great variety of bewildering directions. They are called "myths" because they contain only narration and nothing really necessary to the understanding of salvation.
1 Timothy 1:8 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
The purpose of the law is to prohibit all iniquity and to set a minimum standard for those in need of it. For those who have been justified and freed from sin it is superfluous. These are the baptized, who need not to be instructed to refrain from sin, but rather to be taught to conform to the pattern in which they now stand.
1 Timothy 1:18 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
It was according to divine revelation that I, Paul, laid hands on you and entrust to you the work of teaching.
1 Timothy 1:20 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
The sinner is handed over to Satan, that is, is separated from the church, so that penitence may follow.
1 Timothy 2:5 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
This refers to the perfect humanity by which salvation is wrought. The fact that Jesus shares a common humanity with us is the whole key to salvation.
1 Timothy 2:11 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
While Paul forbids women teaching in church, he very much wants them to exercise their authority in the home as the teachers of virtue.
1 Timothy 2:15 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
The claim that she will be saved by childbearing is said of all women, not just of Eve.
1 Timothy 3:2 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
"Without reproach" can scarcely mean "without critics," since Paul himself had such, but blameless as to living.
1 Timothy 3:3 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
Not striking without reasonable cause, for sometimes this is permitted, if for a good reason and not with undue fierceness.
1 Timothy 3:4-5 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
What is meant by good management, in the case of the children, is that the father is to guide them with wise counsel, such that, if they end up as nonbelievers, it is not his fault.
1 Timothy 3:7 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
This reason is foremost, and in no way weaker than the ones already mentioned, that it is not prudent to entrust the care of others to such a one and to offer such great power so quickly. Why? Because he has not yet given proof of his life and manners, and it is not yet certain as to whether anything is left of his former life, since the devil has many devices to use against him. These are such that he may fall back into old sins. Indeed, because it seems that he has moved away from his former and worse state, he cannot be corrected in the direction of better things, for he is now seen to have had the nurture of others entrusted to him instead.
1 Timothy 3:8 — COMMENTARY ON THE FIRST LETTER TO TIMOTHY
Since the ministry of deacons is at least as much toward the women in the community as the men, their integrity is all the more important. They are to be honorable and sincere in performing the duties assigned to them by the presbyters.
1 Timothy 3:9 — COMMENTARY ON THE FIRST LETTER TO TIMOTHY
The mystery of faith referred to by the apostle here is the teaching about Christ, which he is about to expound in what follows.
1 Timothy 3:13 — COMMENTARY ON THE FIRST LETTER TO TIMOTHY
A "good reward" refers to a future, heavenly good, since earthly promotion would have required the idea of "better reward."
1 Timothy 3:16 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
The "mystery" is the scriptural teaching concerning Christ.
1 Timothy 4:2 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
"Having their consciences seared" means not having a whole conscience, for they live the opposite of what they teach.
1 Timothy 4:7 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
Paul is here rejecting apocryphal books that profess to contain his teaching or that of other apostles but that are really misrepresentations of that teaching.
1 Timothy 4:14 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
Those whom he calls presbyters in this passage are not those whom we now call by that name—Paul does not usually allow to presbyters as such the power of ordination by the laying on of hands. Rather he says that the gathering of the apostles was present with him when he laid hands in his ordination. He calls this the "council of presbyters" as a designation of honor. It is in accordance with this custom that at the ordination of a bishop not one, but the multitude of bishops present, implement the ordination.
1 Timothy 5:3 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
Paul's intention is precisely not to give honor to women who have given only a promise of widowhood but rather to give honor to those who have clearly fulfilled the promise by their action.
1 Timothy 5:4 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
It is the children and grandchildren who should learn their religious duties, namely, to care for widowed forebears, and not the widows who are to learn, for it is precisely they who are worthy of assistance, partly because they have no children.
1 Timothy 5:9 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
What is said here applies only to the order of widows and not to deaconesses, as some believe.
1 Timothy 5:19 — COMMENTARY ON 1 TIMOTHY
It is the duty of the presbyter to function as the common father of both the men and women of the congregation; because the care of both sexes involves seeing and speaking discreetly with the women, pastoral work must be done with great reverence. Furthermore, the duty of presbyters involves the administration of penitential discipline on admitted sinners and the exercise of oversight where such discipline is substandard. For both reasons the presbyters are vulnerable to charges.
2 Corinthians 1:3 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul does not begin with suffering but with comfort, giving thanks for that before going on to explain that it came about through suffering.
2 Corinthians 1:24 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul says that he finds no fault with their faith. However, there are some other things which need to be put right, and he is concerned with those.
2 Corinthians 3:7 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul did not say the dispensation of the law but the dispensation of death, speaking rather of its result in order to lessen its attraction.
2 Corinthians 3:17 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
If Paul had wanted to say that the Lord is a spirit, he would have left the article the out. Compare John [4:24], where in speaking to the Samaritan woman, Jesus says that God is a spirit, meaning that he does not have a body. But in this case Paul puts the article in, which proves that he is not saying that the Lord is a spirit but rather that the Spirit is Lord.
2 Corinthians 8:23 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
The two "as for" phrases do not denote a contrast between them but rather emphasize the similarity.
2 Corinthians 10:4 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
By "worldly weapons" Paul means the law of Moses.
2 Corinthians 11:29 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
By "weak" in this case Paul means "sinful."
2 Corinthians 12:4 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
He saw the beautiful appearance of paradise, the dances of the saints in it and the harmonious sound of its hymnody.
2 Thessalonians 1:3 — COMMENTARY ON 2 THESSALONIANS
Paul seems to say here that the activity of grace has grown, for he does not say that "we give thanks" but that "we are bound to give thanks." In the same way we deserve to have a complaint lodged against us if we do not render to someone what is justly owed. This is the force of "as is fitting," where the point is that there has been an increase in the work of grace, such that what has happened in the Thessalonians is rightly referred to God as its source.
2 Thessalonians 1:9 — COMMENTARY ON 2 THESSALONIANS
Paul shows here just how seriousness this punishment is by his use of "eternal." Indeed the punishment of those wicked who have died is completed in a reality that transcends time itself and is forever.
2 Timothy 1:10 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
The gospel is ancient in the will of the Giver, even if new in the chain of events. God has demonstrated his eternal will in Christ.
2 Timothy 1:12 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
The "deposit" is the pledge of the Spirit given to Paul that he may be preserved.
2 Timothy 2:8 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
Some were teaching that it was merely the "assumed body" which came from the seed of David. Paul taught this to combat Simon's Docetic heresy, by which the resurrection is emptied of meaning.
2 Timothy 2:15 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
Paul's intent here is to urge Timothy to teach with a correct purpose, so that the word is not undermined.
2 Timothy 2:18 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
The heretical teaching about the resurrection is that it happens in the process of natural procreation, by which our children succeed us.
2 Timothy 2:20 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
Here the house is the church, where different persons are not at all equal, yet each serves his or her use.
2 Timothy 3:8 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
A great deal of foolishness has been written about how Paul could have known the names of these two men who resisted Moses. Particularly absurd is the notion that he had access to some information or writing now lost to us.
2 Timothy 3:9 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
The growth that the heretics enjoy will only be in numbers, not in depth or substance.
2 Timothy 3:15 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
Paul here lays out four reasons why Timothy ought to be steadfast, if he will recall them: first, because of the teacher from whom he learned; second, the time when he learned it; third, the source from which the teaching came; and finally, the sublime purpose for which he learned it.
2 Timothy 3:16 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
The usefulness of Scripture lies in its detailing of what one ought to do, either to convict sinners or to clarify what correction is necessary for penitents or to teach what can bring persons to righteousness.
2 Timothy 4:2 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
"Reprove" applies to those who persist in their sin, that they might be led to understand it as sin. "Rebuke" is aimed at those actually engaging in sin. "Exhort" is directed to those who might be led back to their former state after penitence.
2 Timothy 4:6 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
Paul does not say libor but delibor, that is, enduring death in the confession of Christ as a libation of wine is poured out on behalf of honoring God.
2 Timothy 4:10 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
He calls "Galatia" what we now call Gaul; for so all of the older peoples called this place, as anyone can recognize from many sources, especially from the Jewish history written by Josephus. For those people who are now called Galatians are so designated in the old narratives that trace their movement from those regions to various places.
2 Timothy 4:13 — COMMENTARY ON 2 TIMOTHY
The view that this paenula is some other kind of book, rather than just a garment, is ridiculous.
Amos 2:7 — COMMENTARY ON AMOS 2:6–8
They so multiplied their ill-gotten gains as to betray the rights of the needy for the basest profit (the meaning of the phrase "sandals trampling the dust of the earth," which was clear proof of their setting no store by justice, especially as they easily did so for base profit). "They pummeled the heads of the poor." Of the same people he says that they not only failed to vindicate their claim on justice but even belabored them without risk—hence his going on, "and strayed from the path of the lowly." Though their behavior was correct, they changed the verdict to a negative one, scorning them for their lowliness.
Amos 6:9-10 — COMMENTARY ON AMOS 6:9–10
The passage involves deep obscurity from the viewpoint of commentary. It resembles the part in Genesis where there is mention of the treaty that Laban and Jacob made with each other about ownership of the offspring of the sheep, one man owning some, the other owning others. While that is obscure in its expression, the sense gains clarity in the course of comment. Now it is necessary to expound the sense of this passage as well, whose reference is not clearly expressed. His intention, in fact, is to cite a proof of the devastation affecting them in that it was very extreme. In many cases scarcely ten will be left from a large household of many members, the rest being done away with in various ways through the war.
Ephesians 2:10 — EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS 2.10
Here he is speaking not of the first but of the second creation, wherein we are re-created by the resurrection. Completely unable as we are to mend our ways by our own decision on account of the natural weakness that opposes us, we are made able to come newly alive without pain and with great ease by the grace of the One who re-creates us for this purpose.
Ephesians 2:14 — CATENA 2.13
Christ, conferring immortality on us through his resurrection, has put an end to this division [between Jew and Gentile], for there can be no circumcision of an immortal nature.
Galatians 1:7 — EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS
Just as with royal currency—anyone who cuts off a little from the impress has debased the whole currency—so one who makes even the smallest change in sound faith adulterates the whole.
Galatians 3:16 — EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS
The words and to his offspring are found to be strictly fulfilled in Christ in their straightforward sense, since he is Abraham's offspring by nature, as are all those who derive their stock from that source. We, believing in him, are therefore enrolled as children of Abraham and thereby receive fellowship in the blessing. The result is that what appears to be said to one can in fact be understood commonly of many, insofar as all who derive from that source are of Abraham. This promise is completely fulfilled in Christ in the light of the actual events.
Galatians 4:24 — COMMENTARY
Those who are at great pains to pervert the meaning of the divine Scriptures … abuse this saying of the apostle's, as though they thought that they could derive from it the power to suppress the entire sense of holy Scripture in their aspirations to speak "allegorically," as if in the manner of the apostle. They fail to see how great a difference there is between their own position and that of the apostle in this passage. For the apostle does not deny the history or pick apart the events of the distant past, but he has stated them as they happened at the time, while using for his own purpose the interpretation of these events.… He would not have said "referred to one who was born" if he had not believed that person had really existed. There cannot be a simile if one takes away the historical reality itself.
Genesis 19:1 — CATENA ON GENESIS 3.1110
It was "three men" who came to Abraham, and "in the heat of the day"; but in the case of Sodom, "two angels, and in the evening." Good things are likened to light, bad things to evening, since the "sun of justice" has set on them. For the punishment of the wicked is night and darkness, but the righteous "will shine like light." It is significant too that where there was an announcement of good things, the Lord was present. But when the subject is punishment, he does not appear in person, showing that when people have good experiences, it is his pleasure, so that he chooses, as it were, to act directly in such matters. Since he takes no pleasure in punishments but inflicts them only because of necessity, he makes use of underlings.
Habakkuk 1:2 — COMMENTARY ON HABAKKUK 1:2
It is not as though bringing a censure against God that the prophet says this. Rather, he speaks this way as it is the custom with people who are in some sort of trouble or who are righteously indignant with those responsible to present the injustice of what is being done under the guise of censure. Blessed David also says in like manner, "Why, O Lord, do you keep your distance? Why do you look down on us in good times and in bad? When the godless act disdainfully, the poor person is inflamed," and so on, saying this not to censure God but to express indignation with those responsible for it and at a loss as to how they are not quickly called to account.
Habakkuk 2:4 — COMMENTARY ON HABAKKUK 2:1-4
"But the righteous one will live from my faith." So even if someone should be uncertain in their trust in the future and doubt if it will really happen, such a one is very much the object of dislike to me, because I define a righteous person as one who trusts in the promises and gets benefit from them.
Haggai 1:9-11 — COMMENTARY ON HAGGAI 1:9-11
He intends by this to remind them of what they have suffered by neglecting the temple. When you overlooked my house lying in ruins and took an interest in rebuilding your own houses, he is saying, then the rain stopped, the land did not yield its crops, and I destroyed all the crops on the ground as though with a sword, striking many times both people and cattle, and in short ruining the fruit of your labors. In fact, to this exhortation to climb up, cut wood, bring it and give thought to rebuilding, he added these things to cause them fear by the reminder of what had happened lest they receive the command listlessly.
Haggai 2:5 — COMMENTARY ON HAGGAI 2:1-5
Likewise here too when he says, "My spirit has taken a position in your midst," he means, my grace and my disposition toward you accompanies you, taking a position and providing you with its benefit. In other words, just as he speaks of a soul in reference to God, thus implying not some hypostasis [i.e., separate entity] but his attitude to something—as when he says, "My soul hates your new moons and sabbaths" to refer to the attitude by which he hated what was done by them in their depraved behavior—so too is his mention of the "spirit."
Hebrews 1:2 — FRAGMENTS ON THE TREATISE ON THE INCARNATION 12.1
He does not say, "God spoke to us in the Son" but simply "in a Son." By saying this and making no separation, he was able to signify both in a single expression. First of all, he signifies the true Son, and by true Son I mean the one who possesses sonship by his natural birth. In the second place, he also includes in this designation the one who shares truly in the dignity of sonship because of his union with God.
Hebrews 1:2 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 1.2-3
"Through whom also he made the ages." An age is not a nature that is able to exist in substance but is understood to be a certain interval. This interval can be perceived from its having a beginning of existence until its end or until some other age has likewise taken its beginning.… The "creator of the ages" means nothing different than "everlasting, existing beyond every age, having his own limitless existence." For the maker exists before the things which are made, but an interval of time must be perceived by its having a beginning.… When blessed David says, "Who exists before the ages," he does not wish this to say that God exists before the latter ages, but that God has eternal existence, being earlier than every interval of time. When Paul says, "through whom God also made the ages," Paul does not wish God to be the creator of the later ages but to be eternal and the cause of all ages that have a beginning.
Hebrews 1:3 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 1.3
He not only says that he is the maker of all things, but that he certainly also makes them by the great abundance of his power, for all things hang upon his voice, as it were. For this expression "who calls into existence the things that do not exist" does not differ from the account of blessed Moses, who says, "And God said, 'Let there be light' and there was light … 'Let there be a firmament' and there was a firmament."
Hebrews 1:3 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 1.2-3
"Who, being the radiance of glory and the exact representation of his substance." Quite appropriately he does not say "God" but "glory." In this way he does not allow us to meddle in the things of that nature when we are thunderstruck by his name, since of course the only "glory" worth mentioning is God's nature. Paul uses the analogy of "radiance" for that which he deemed most essential, and by the next phrase he explicates the point of the analogy. For he says that Christ preserves an accurate representation of God's nature, so that whatever you would think God's nature to be, so you must also think Christ's nature to be, inasmuch as Christ's nature bears the accurate representation of God's nature since Christ's nature does not differ from God's in the least.
Hebrews 1:3 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.1
Indeed, there is a great deal of similarity [between the opening of John's Gospel and] the apostle's statement. After Paul calls him "the brightness of his glory," he adds, "the very stamp of his nature." With great care he turns from a statement of their distinction to an indication of their perfect likeness.
Hebrews 1:3 — COMMENTARY ON EPHESIANS 1.16
He is the "Father of glory" in that Paul is accustomed to use the word glory to refer to the divine nature, because it is glorious and marvelous. So in Hebrews he says the Son is the "brightness of his glory." Instead of this he might have said "God" or "divine nature."
Hebrews 1:7-8 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 1.7-8
The mention of the angels' "service" (wind) shows their quickness, while the mention of "ministry" (flames) shows their power. When he says that the angels have been made these things, he presents how they also have the ability to be these things. And he distinguishes them from the "Creator" and "God" and "throne" and "scepter of the kingdom," all of which are symbols of his highest honor and worthiness. For also the phrase God reveals his highest nature, and throne and scepter set forth the certainty of this apart from human honors and worthiness. Then also the phrase "forever and ever" proves this, for the word Creator shows those things that have come into existence have their beginning in time, but this passage demonstrates the eternity of his kingdom.
Hebrews 1:12 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 1.12
It is possible to see in a glance that whenever the Old Testament speaks about the divine nature, it does not speak distinctly about the Father alone, as the heretics suppose when they attempt to apply "I am God and there is no other besides me" and similar passages to the Father alone. On the contrary, whatever it says concerning God as it expounds upon the divine nature, it says in such a way that those attributes may be joined together with the Son and the Holy Spirit, owing to the fellowship of their nature. Otherwise how has the apostle dragged in this second scriptural witness from it?… Has not Paul done the same in his epistle to the Romans, where he says, "For it is written, 'As I live,' says the Lord, 'every knee shall bow to me' "? For no one would find here something that would clearly distinguish between them.
Hebrews 1:14 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 1.14-2.1
That the angels were "ministering spirits" he has established from previous testimony, but now he finally renews the image of their service, saying that they do everything in service for the things needful for our salvation. For it is not a small thing to know the need for the assistance of their service.
Hebrews 2:3-4 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 2.3-4
Paul showed that there is a very great difference between the old covenant and the new covenant, since he speaks about the "word" in the first covenant, but in this covenant he speaks of "salvation." For the first covenant was only a giving of customs and observances, whereas in this covenant there is also the grace of the Spirit and release from sins and the promise of the kingdom of heaven and the promise of immortality. Therefore, he also rightly says, "such a great salvation," showing by the epithet its greatness. In the first covenant it was given "through the angels," but now "through the Lord." And since there were marvels with the former covenant, so that the new covenant might not seem inferior to the old in this respect, he well appended the statement, "while God further testified with signs and wonders and various powers," saying this so that by its increase the fullness of grace might appear beyond that of the law also in this matter. For there the wonders took place only according to the need, but here also many of those outside the faith were healed through us, from even whatsoever diseases happened to afflict them. For such was the abundance of healings among us. Also the dead were raised.… After comparing and contrasting the difference and showing the superiority in a various and manifold manner, he added a greater thing that did not happen to those in the law: "and by gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed." For that each of the believers should have their own share in the Spirit was a characteristic of those in grace. And well he adds in addition to all these things "according to his own will," that is, the will of God who fully wished once and for all to lavish us greatly so that his grace for us might not be repented of, and that the gifts of grace once given to us might not be changed along with the things of the previous covenant, as some might suspect.
Hebrews 2:9 — FRAGMENTS ON THE TREATISE ON THE INCARNATION 2
Jesus is a man. For "what is man that you are mindful of him?" Yet the apostle asserts that this passage refers to Jesus, for he says, "We see him who was made a little lower than the angels, Jesus." What then do we conclude? The man Jesus was like all humans and differed in no way from those whose nature he shares, save that to him a grace was given. The grace that was given does not change his nature. But after death was destroyed, "God gave him the name which is above every name." The one who gave is God. The one to whom it was given is the man Jesus Christ, the first fruits of those who are raised. For he is the "firstborn from the dead." Therefore, he ascended and sits at the right hand of the Father and is above all.
Hebrews 2:9 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 2.9-10
Some suffer something very laughable here, changing "without God" and making it to read "by the grace of God," not following the Scripture's train of thought. Owing to their failure to understand that he once said, "without God," they erase it to no profit and put in what seems satisfactory to their opinion. Yet what notion would be suggested by Paul inserting "by the grace of God"? And what train of thought would lead him to this? For it is not his custom to append "by the grace of God" capriciously, but always there is some logical train of thought involved. For example, he talks about grace when he, talking about his experience, adds, "by the grace of God I am what I am." Or when it is his task to speak concerning God's love for humankind and that God has done all things, even though we are not worthy to obtain them, as is contained in his statement, "By grace you have been saved," … he appends, "And this not of your own doing, it is the gift of God, not because of works, lest any one should boast." Clearly he shows through this, that he is speaking concerning the grace of God, which he showed on behalf of all people. But in Hebrews Paul is discussing what is being set forth by him concerning Christ, what sort of person he is and how he differs from the angels (the starting point of his discussion), and in what respect he seems to be lower than them because of his death. What need was there then for him to say, "by the grace of God"? It is out of place for him to speak concerning his goodness concerning us.Instead, the line of argument shows this to be the case when he says, "without God he tasted death," since his divinity was not hindered in this respect, and therefore he showed a diminution "for a short time" from his usual state. He appears also here to share the honor because of his connection with the other nature. It is most natural that those who have heard these things would think that the indwelling of the Word of God would be spectacular at the time of his suffering, even though this does not correspond with the things that have been set forth. Yet "without" God he tasted the trial of death, he adds, "For it was fitting for him, on whose account all things exist and through whom all things exist, having led many sons into glory while he was the originator of their salvation to be made perfect through suffering." It is not that his divinity was not a contributor, he says. For the usual things "were fitting." … For, let me tell you, the fact of suffering in no way was appropriate for it. But clearly this "it was fitting" confirms the notion of "without God." For although it was not fitting, Paul himself says that it is fitting, showing at the same time also what sort of things he once did, and what they were. "For it was fitting for him, because of whom and through whom all things exist." Quite clearly he is speaking about the divine Word, inasmuch as he shared with many his sonship and led them into this glory. He is the "originator" of everybody's "salvation," our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the one who is said flatly to have been accepted as a perfect man through his sufferings, so that also Christ's nature and God's grace might be made manifest.
Hebrews 2:9 — FRAGMENTS ON THE TREATISE ON THE INCARNATION 12.2
In this account of the sonship, the apostle appears to include the man who was assumed with the "many," not because, like them, he received the sonship by grace, since the Godhead alone possesses the sonship by nature.
Hebrews 2:10 — COMMENTARY ON HEBREWS 2.9-10
And the pioneer of all men's salvation, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the man assumed by him, is declared perfect through sufferings in such a way that both his own nature and God's grace are made evident.
Hebrews 2:13 — CATECHETICAL HOMILIES 16.25
He [Christ] has given us in holy baptism regeneration, and by this he makes us his own body, his own flesh, his offspring—as it is written, "Here am I, and the children God has given me."
Hebrews 3:1 — CATECHETICAL HOMILIES 15.16
Because it is also the work of a high priest to enter God's presence first and then to bring the others close to him, he [Paul] quite rightly calls him high priest, because he did this in fact. Blessed Paul calls him this because by the resurrection of the dead he ascended into heaven and sat down at the right hand of God, and by these events he gave us, too, closeness to God and participation in the good things.
Hebrews 3:1 — CATECHETICAL HOMILIES 12.4
But once for all heavenly things were made accessible to humans, when one of us humans was assumed and, according to the law of human nature, died and was raised from the dead in a marvelous fashion and, because immortal and incorruptible by nature, ascended into heaven. And he became high priest for the rest of humankind and the pledge for their ascension into heaven.
Hebrews 3:12-14 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 3.12-14
This word comes to ones who have already come to faith, as I understand it. So that it is fitting for you to praise the same things so that you might remain in the same opinions once and for all. This then Paul says, because those who believe and who have received the Spirit "share" in the substance of Christ, since they have received some physical fellowship with him. Then finally it remains to guard thoroughly this beginning with an uncontaminated mind.
Hebrews 3:14 — COMMENTARY ON HEBREWS 3.12-13
He says that those who have believed and shared in the Spirit have become partakers in Christ's "hypostasis" in that they have received a certain natural communion with him. Now there remains the task of preserving this foundation with a pure resolve.
Hebrews 3:16-18 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 3.16-18
He wishes to show that all who went out through Moses perished because of their unbelief, so that these might fear all the more since they were in a similar situation to those against whom he was making the argument.
Hebrews 4:1-2 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 4.1-2
It was fitting for them to be afraid, he says so that they might not be found lacking because of the depravity of their opinion, when they themselves had received the promise of access into the rest. For let no one suppose that the promise of the things to come are sufficient for him, just as it was not sufficient for them. For they were not joined to the things promised in accordance with faith. Therefore, one ought to read as follows, "They did not attach themselves in faith to the things that they heard," namely, the promises that were made to them from God through Moses.
Hebrews 4:1-2 — COMMENTARY ON HEBREWS 4.1-2
We ought to be afraid … lest we, too, who have received the promise of the entrance into the rest, may be found lacking through a wickedness of purpose. For let no one think that the promise of things to come suffices him any more than it did them. Indeed, they did not understand in faith what had been promised.
Hebrews 4:4-7 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 4.4-7
This is the work of true "rest," namely, not having to run again to the old things, while enduring transition and change. For just as God is said to rest from his creation of the world, having completed its foundation, so it is fitting that also the one who has entered "into rest" not run back again to the old things, viewing with contempt the labors required by the law's virtuous ordinances to restrain transgression. For out of necessity change and a removal from the old institution follows these things.
Hebrews 4:7 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 4.4-7
"Today" is neither an indefinite period of time, nor can it be predicated of an interval outside of "days" as if "today" were joined with each day. This should be stated not only for the sake of apostolic perspicuity but also for the sake of those who wish to understand, in the matter of the origin of the Only Begotten, the "I have begotten you today" by flatly asserting that the "today" is an indefinite period of time. They cannot perceive that if this were the case one would not be able to speak of a "today" since there was then not yet a day. The apostle has made clear that he would not say that "today" is an indefinite period of time when he said, "Again speaking in David he marks off a day." Also in another passage, "Comfort them every day until it will be called 'the Day.' " First he showed that the "today" is not being spoken of outside of "days," by his saying "every day," and so appending "until it will be called 'the Day.' " Then in the matter of the "day" it does not appear as if he were talking about an indefinite period of time which might be applied both to the time that has already passed and the time that is about to come. For what does he say? Deeming "each day" to be "the Day" which is spoken to we should give heed to remaining in the faith. For as "the Day" indicates the present day, he advises them to make full use of the day for that which is useful for exhortation.
Hebrews 5:7 — TREATISES AGAINST APOLLINARIS 3.4
Even if he [the Word] gave a certain exceptional cooperation to the one who was assumed, this does not mean that the divinity took the place of the mind. If the divinity did take the place of his mind in the assumed man, as you say, how is it that he felt fear in his passion? Why did he need strong prayers in the face of necessity, the strong prayers that he offered to God with a loud voice and many tears, according to blessed Paul?
Hebrews 6:18 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 6.18
"Through two unchangeable things," namely, that God would never be able to lie about what had been promised and that he made the promise with an oath.
Hebrews 6:20 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 6.20
Paul added that "Christ" has become "an eternal high priest" for us, in that Christ leads all those believing through him in each generation to God based on the hope of the resurrection.
Hebrews 7:3 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 7.3
When Paul wished to show that Christ was a high priest after the order of Melchizedek, he speaks those things that pertain to him, not explaining his nature but putting forth the explanation about him found in the divine Scripture and demonstrating the similarity between Melchizedek and Christ from the Scripture.Thus, he calls him "fatherless" and "motherless," on the grounds that the divine Scripture does not narrate his genealogy. Then he adds, "being without genealogy," showing that he is not talking about the nature of the man but rather the account of the divine Scripture. Then he further connects in the thought "neither having a beginning of days nor an end of life"—not in his nature but in the divine Scripture. And since it was possible to also say these about another person—for the divine Scripture does not remember to note the parents of many people or to set forth their genealogy, especially as many as we have learned were born outside the Israelite race—he does well to add, "being likened to the Son of God, he remains a priest forever." For no longer does this apply to the rest as it does to him. And he makes clear from this explanation of the Scripture how Christ has this property as well as the rest. For Christ was "without father" in the begetting of his humanity, and "without mother" in the origin of his divine essence, and really "without genealogy." For what genealogy would there be of him who exists from his Father alone? And it is also clear that "he has neither beginning of days nor an end of life." In the case of Christ it is actually the case, whereas in the case of Melchizedek it is what we find (or do not find) in the Scripture's account of him. Christ received his "priesthood forever" from the divine Scripture where it said, "You are a priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek," even as Melchizedek acts as priest eternally. And he calls him an "eternal" priest on the grounds that he has not passed on the priesthood to successors, which happened to be the case under Mosaic law. Therefore he also said, "Having been likened to the Son of God," and yet it was appropriate to say that the Son had been made like Melchizedek—for the first is not made like the second. Yet the truth took place in connection with Christ, but no such thing took place beforehand with Melchizedek. So he says that Melchizedek was made like Christ by the way that he appears in the narrative, since the divine Scripture wished to show to us in its narration of the life of Melchizedek the similarity with the one who was to be.
Hebrews 7:3 — TREATISES AGAINST APOLLINARIS 3.1
God the Word was not generated from a woman; the one generated from a woman was the one fashioned in her by the power of the Holy Spirit. The one who is of one essence with the Father was not born from her womb, for he is "without mother," as blessed Paul's phrase has it. It was rather the one fashioned in his mother's womb by the power of the Holy Spirit who came in the last times. For this reason he is also called "without father."
Hebrews 7:20-22 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 7.20-22
He says that it shows the difference between Christ and Aaron in that Christ received the priesthood with an oath. For those who became priests without oaths became so because of their need to cease being priests at some time, but Christ entered the priesthood with oaths, since he intended to remain based on his rank. He shows his rank is far greater than those under the law, since he intended also to furnish a greater high priest to those coming to him. For in this way he says he becomes "a surety" … for being the first to rise, just as he also calls him a "high priest," so he pledges to us a similar resurrection.
Hebrews 9:1-2 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 9.1-2
He begins to say how there were symbols in the law and the types of things in the era of grace and how it was possible to see clearly the things of the new covenant glimpsed beforehand in the things of the old covenant, even as he shows in comparison what sort of preeminence the new covenant things have over those of the old covenant. He makes this the beginning of the exposition of his teaching. Then he says that also the first testament had bounds and commandments of ritual that were obligated to be offered to God. The phrase "regulations for worship" refers to the commandments concerning these things."And an earthly sanctuary." Most likely he calls the temple "the sanctuary" because the liturgy is rendered in it to God, or also he calls the tabernacle "the sanctuary," since they had this in service before the temple. For in a similar manner he called the tabernacle "the temple," inasmuch as God happened to be present in it, while the later temple was built by Solomon. "And Samuel sat in the temple of the Lord where the ark of God was," although the temple had not yet been built by Solomon. And just as when God commanded Moses to erect the tabernacle as a symbol of the world according to a certain plan, God ordered him to make an enclosure out of curtains that would divide the middle from the rest, so also the temple was made according to the same plan.
Hebrews 9:27-28 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 9.28
Christ having now been seen when he gained mastery over sin, took on death that had power because of sin. When sin had been atoned for, as was reasonable, he also will appear apart from suffering. For "without sin" means that when sin no longer has power, so also he himself will be seen apart from all human suffering.
Hebrews 10:5 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 10.5
These things have been spoken to those in Babylon who wanted to say to God, "You did not demand sacrifices from me but only to obey you and to do your will." And right away the things pertaining to the quotation have become unambiguous as far as I am concerned. Changing it he speaks in this way about the person of Christ, saying, "I will establish a body" instead of "I will establish ears."
Hebrews 10:26-27 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 10.26-27
Those who have changed from the better to the worse must in the end be handed over to punishment, when they rise from the dead, since they did not allow any repentance in this life. For not merely in the present life does such an individual abolish repentance, but by his inability to assent to repentance he remains content with his fall and takes no notice of his stumbling, accomplishing every sort of sin with much pleasure by a certain lack of reason.
Hebrews 11:1-2 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 11.1-2
He has made use of many proofs, since he knew the Jews especially questioned faith by means of a certain line of argument. For the Jews were setting forth the law and righteousness by their works, but Christians set forth faith, saying that even if someone should be guilty of ten thousand evils, by only believing in Christ he receives immediately deliverance from all of them, being deemed worthy of justification from him. Therefore, having determined this, then partly to appropriate the things that had been said before and partly to be able to show that faith appeared among all the virtuous men of old, he adds, "by faith the men of old received divine approval."
Hebrews 11:19 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 11.19
He obtained it in accordance with his faith. For believing in the resurrection, he received him who had died symbolically. For the fact that he suffered nothing, although he fully expected to die, was a symbol of the one who would truly rise, inasmuch as, "having tasted death for a short time," he rose, having suffered nothing under death's power. For this was done "in a parable" instead of in symbols.
Hebrews 11:39-40 — COMMENTARY ON 1 THESSALONIANS 4:16-17
It is also clear from the passage that when he says, "the dead in Christ will rise first," he does not mean to neglect the just who died before Christ's coming. Otherwise, how could he explicitly say in the epistle to the Hebrews, "And all these, though well attested by their faith, did not receive what was promised, since God had foreseen something better for us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect."
Hebrews 12:1 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 12.1
He did not simply say that there is one time of repayment for all—for this was not his intention—but he said this to show that also those who had done such things and suffered such things through faith might still await the payment of the things promised. Not bearing it with ill grace, they are brought with us of the later generation. Thus he showed their even greater endurance, if indeed they still await after death those who ought to contend likewise with them so that with them we may obtain the enjoyment of all the good. And therefore he speaks of "witnesses," not of the things suffered but of the things testified for our faith.
Hebrews 12:12-13 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 12.12-13
Where are those who say that the apostle in this epistle precludes repentance by saying, "It is impossible to renew again thereafter to repentance those once enlightened"? How then do they understand these words: "Therefore lift your drooping hands and strengthen your weak knees"? What sort of healing of the lame does this apostle, who allegedly does not believe in a repentance for those who have sinned, wish to take place? It is clear he writes these things to believers in that he says to them: "Recall the former days when, after you were enlightened, you endured a hard struggle with sufferings."
Hebrews 12:16-17 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 12.17
Through these words he does not wish to preclude the chance of repentance, but to teach that it is not possible for those who do not receive correction at the present time to receive it later.… For he has not been eager to say contradictory things, especially in so close proximity. And anyone could figure this out from the example that he uses. For first he made mention of Esau, who partly was disheartened when he did not obtain the blessing, but partly abided the decision even after this event owing to the malice of his character. Then when he repented of his assent to sin, he did not obtain the blessing. For he was not asking for repentance, but for the blessing that had been given to his brother in accordance with the worthiness of his character. It was impossible that the blessing would again be taken away and given to him again. Also, however, it is possible to discover that his tears were not altogether unprofitable. His father seems to have grieved thereafter for his careless son and seems to have given him some blessings. So he does not wish to preclude repentance through these words.
Hebrews 12:26-27 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 12.26
Based on the voice of the prophet he proves both the change from the things that now exist and the establishment of the things that follow. For the promise "to shake" makes clear that they will change altogether in the future. By the addition of the word "once and for all" he shows clearly that thereafter they will be unchangeable.
Hebrews 12:26-27 — COMMENTARY ON HEBREWS 12.26
Quite rightly on the basis of the prophetic verse does he establish the instability of the present order and the steadfastness of the things which shall be later. For the "shaking" shows that he is proclaiming the alteration of the present order exactly as it will be. And by adding the word once he shows that what will be afterwards cannot be changed.
Hebrews 12:28-29 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.1
The apostle did not think it possible to describe God's judgment sufficiently in any other way than through an analogy from our experience, and for this reason he did not hesitate to call God "fire."
Hebrews 13:7 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 13.7
"The leaders" are those who have proclaimed the word of godliness among them and were killed by the Jews on the spot. And there were many, not only Stephen and James who was killed by the sword, but also James, brother of our Lord, and very many others handed over in silence.
Hebrews 13:15-16 — FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 13.16
He calls it "doing good" in order to praise what takes place and "fellowship" because they are concerned about their fellow believers … and so with zeal they seek to meet their needs.
Hosea 1:2 — COMMENTARY ON HOSEA 1:2
By the law the prophet was allowed to take a woman into the marriage relationship, and on marrying her he probably brought her to chaste ways. In fact, while everyone could not but be surprised that a man who was very conscious of propriety should pass over women who enjoyed a good reputation and choose to take a prostitute into the marriage relationship, the novelty of the event provided the prophet with the occasion of telling them their duty. In addition [Hosea's marriage demonstrated] the greater marvel of God's condescending to choose such ungrateful people for special attention by the powerful example—namely, the remarkable prophet's doing his duty by entering into association with a prostitute.
Hosea 4:4 — COMMENTARY ON HOSEA 4
My people are like a priest who is compromised. He has fallen from his previous dignity and does not appear worthy for any reason, just as a priest who falls into controversy would be set aside and dishonored by everyone. "And he will be weak by day." To the greatest extent he will become weak because of the upcoming evils.
Hosea 4:5 — COMMENTARY ON HOSEA 4
Of the ones who first made use of false predictions to deceive you, most will also themselves become weak because of the calamity that holds them back. As if they were wrapped up in some kind of night darkness, they see the pursuit of deceit, which was useless for them.
Hosea 9:1 — COMMENTARY ON HOSEA 9
It is not fitting for you to rejoice and exult like the rest of the peoples. For they did not receive any teaching which might lead them to piety, but you, after much instruction and knowledge of God, rebelled against the knowledge which had been given to you because of the depravity of your opinion, and turned to the worship of the idols.
Hosea 14:9 — COMMENTARY ON HOSEA 14:10
You could really demonstrate that a wise and understanding person is the one with knowledge of what has been said and with zeal for the things by which it is possible for people who avoid evil and zealously practice good to be established in freedom from lower things and in enjoyment of higher things. This is because everything done by God is marked by great correctness, with which he also applies punishment to the fallen and knows how to achieve their salvation when they repent. You could also demonstrate that the righteous are those of their number who also know how to profit from each category and who develop greater self-control from the punishments, on the one hand, while taking the enjoyment of the good things stemming from repentance as a stimulus to virtue, on the other. You could also demonstrate that the impious are those who deserve troubles in every way and of every kind, gaining nothing from them, stuck fast in a downward direction, and as a result not able to understand anything of their duty.
John 1:1 — COMMENTARY ON THE GOSPEL OF JOHN, FRAGMENT 2.1, 1-2
Since he thought it necessary to speak about the divinity of the Only Begotten and to teach both who he is and the nature of his existence, the blessed John emulates this use of language, saying, "In the beginning was the Word." You see, since Moses described the beginning of the things that were made—showing clearly in the account of creation that their maker preexisted—John judged it to be superfluous for himself also to recount the beginning of what was made and declares that the Son was the beginning of the things that exist; that is, he was in the beginning because he always was. So then, when making inquiry into issues of existence, one concerned with creation should not say that created things existed in the beginning, for they did not exist before they were made, because if they existed, they were not made. Rather, going beyond these—on the ground that at some time they did not exist—since we find something transcending them, we should say that it was this that was in the beginning.Therefore, if indeed the Word did not exist—as the crazed Arians say—but received his existence at a later time, then he was not the one who was in the beginning, and [the title would belong to] the one who was when he was not. I shall not pass over the first and refer to the second as "the beginning." This is, then, the meaning of the Word found in the Gospel of John, since he is the first terminus of the things that exist. If he is the first terminus, however, it was never when he was not, because he always was. Therefore, nothing will ever preexist him—inasmuch as the Father may be regarded as preceding any cause, for he himself exists in himself, so also the Son exists. For this reason he certainly did not mean for the phrase "he was in the beginning" to be taken in the same sense as the phrase "in the beginning God created." Indeed, there the addition of the word created defined the beginning in regard to the created things, so as to signify only their beginning, whereas here he said simply and absolutely, "He was in the beginning." And so it is apparent that the Word discussed here is the Word that is the first and principal beginning, to which nothing of what exists can be regarded as prior. And he added the word was to the phrase "in the beginning" to show that he was indicating without any qualification the "beginning" of the things that exist, which indeed is the "first being" and the "ever-being" and the "never not being."
John 1:1 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.1
In a word, they have shown in their use of terms and exposition of their doctrines that they call "beginning" that which is before everything. Indeed, you will not find that the divine Scriptures say anything different. Even among common people the name "beginning" is used in a similar sense. Let me now give a suitable example: the blessed Moses, intending to instruct the Jewish nation both about God and created things—how God alone was the one who existed, while they were made—and wishing to explain to us the order of the creation of those things, said, "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." He did not say "they were in the beginning," because he believed that expression was not suitable for things that did not exist by themselves and were created. This is because he knew that the Creator, God, existed before them. Nor was he content only to say "in the beginning." Rather, he said, "In the beginning God created," thinking that it would be better to mention their creator first and then add what had been created in the beginning. He first mentioned God their creator in order to raise the mind of his audience toward him, and then he related the things that were made.
John 1:2 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.1
John wanted to persuade by using the name "Word," as if by an analogy, that it was possible for something to be from something else without having to be separated from it by length of time.… Also, because he said "he was in the beginning," he showed not that he was without a beginning but rather that he was coexistent from eternity with his beginning.
John 1:3 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.2-3
Intending to make the divinity of the Only Begotten clearer, [the Evangelist] wanted to show the difference [of the Son] not only by indicating his dignity but also by demonstrating that he has no participation with the created order. He says, "[The Word] was with God in the beginning," and "All things were made through him." By saying this, he has opposed himself to "all things made." He was, he says, in the beginning with God, all creatures were made through him. And clearly he made a comparison with "in the beginning was," and its opposite, "all things were made through him." Therefore he was not made, because in the beginning he was; they were made because they did not exist before. He himself is the explanation of the precedents. He shows what he means through the words "In the beginning was," clearly asserting his eternity.
John 1:12 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.12
For those, he says, who received him, their reception was not useless. He gave them something great and excellent; certainly, insofar as it is possible, he made them equal in honor by giving them the gift of sonship. They take advantage of that grace not by being reborn in the body according to the natural order of generation. Rather, they are given birth by divine power through a certain similarity and relationship with him.
John 1:14 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.14
In order to explain the word was, the Evangelist added kai eskēnōsen en hēmin, and "tabernacled in us," that is, in this sense he became flesh: he lived in our nature. Evidently the words stand for "lived among us," as also the apostle said about us human beings, "We who are still in this tabernacle groan," where he called our body a tabernacle. He also writes elsewhere, "We know that if the earthly tabernacle we live in is destroyed." It is well known that in Scripture usually the whole person is indicated by "flesh," as in, "To you all flesh shall come."
John 1:16 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.16
"From his fullness," he says, "we have all received," that is, the grace of the Spirit, which is given to us as a gift, we received from his abundance. About his human nature he says that every grace is in it; but at the same time this shows the dignity of the nature that is in him. Through the union with the divine Word, by means of the Spirit, he was made participant in the true relationship. We have taken a part from his spiritual grace, and through it we are made participant together with him in this adoptive affiliation, even though we are very far away from that dignity. And he fortunately added, "grace for grace," indicating with the name of grace the law as well. He says, instead of that grace [of the law] this grace is given.
John 1:29 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.29
As appears from the narrative of the Evangelist, John the Baptist said his previous words as if the Lord had come already and walked among crowds who still ignored him. Now, since he is coming to be baptized, he is described with the words "this is the Lamb of God." Let us consider how Scripture likes to place words in the appropriate context of facts. By saying in this passage, "This is the one who takes away the sin of the world," he did not say "the only begotten Son," or the "Son of God" or "the one who is close to the father's bosom," which appear in what he said above. Although now it would have seemed right to express the greatness of his nature, in order to confirm the promise of the things he was going to give. But this is not what he said. Instead, he called him "lamb," and with this name he signifies his passion. In fact, he was called lamb and sheep to signify his death when he washed away sin. Since the sin reigned in our mortality, and death was gaining strength in us because of sin, Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior came and remitted all these things to us. And after destroying death through his death, he also destroyed the sin rooted in our nature because of mortality. Through his promise he made us immortal, and he will render us so in reality when he defeats sin with the gift of immortality.
John 1:32 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.32
Here it is evident that the Spirit descending like a dove on the baptized Lord was not seen by all those present, but by John only in a sort of spiritual vision. Similarly, the prophets amid many people were used to seeing those things that were invisible to all the others. It would have been useless to say that John testified and said, "I saw the Spirit," if all those present had been participants in that vision as well.
John 1:33 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.33
He revealed why he lived in the wilderness. This certainly happened through a special providence of God, in order that he might not have any relationship with the Messiah. And John certainly would have had such a relationship if he had lived in town, since they were of the same age and they were related. The suspicion would have easily arisen that he had testified those words because of that previous relationship and because of their friendship and the fact that they were related. In order to remove this suspicion, John was segregated from adolescence onward and grew up in the wilderness. Therefore, with good reason he said, "I myself did not know him." I had no familiarity or friendship with him, but I was sent to baptize with water for him so that I might reveal him whom I did not know. He clearly showed that he baptized so that all the Jews who came because of the baptism might have an occasion to hear his doctrine and to see him to whom he testified.
John 1:38 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.38
At once his disciples, who were present, after hearing his words, left John and hurried to go to Jesus about whom John testified. "When Jesus turned and saw them following, he said to them, 'What are you looking for?' " He did not say this out of ignorance but rather in order to give them an occasion to trust him. They immediately called him "Rabbi" and showed their profound intention, that is, that they had been led to Jesus for no other reason but the desire to obey him as a teacher. And at the same time they asked him where he lived, as if they wanted to come to him often. He did not point out a house but told them to come along with him and see, by giving them the space for greater familiarity and trust toward him.
John 1:40 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.39-41
He says that one of those who followed him was Andrew, brother of Simon, without mentioning the other. Evidently this is the blessed John himself. He always appears to pass in silence over those things that concern him. And also whenever he relates something concerning himself, he avoids subscribing his name. If those who received the gospel had not indicated the writer with the prefixed title, we would not have known about whom the text is speaking.
John 1:46 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.46
This is not exactly the way this sentence appears, but rather it should be understood in a different and more doubtful sense, as in "How is it possible that anything good comes out of Nazareth?" In fact, among the Jews the name of that village was much despised, because a great number of its inhabitants were pagans, and it seemed impossible that anything good might come out from there. Therefore also the Pharisees said to Nicodemus, "Search and you will see that no prophet is to arise from Galilee." And so it is only right that Philip says to Nathanael, "Come and see." Since there is now a contrast to that old opinion, [he seems to be saying], I promise to show you the real facts. This was superfluous, otherwise, for someone who had once believed in the truth.
John 1:49 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.49
Therefore Nathanael, convinced by those deeds, said to him, "Rabbi, you are the Son of God. You are the king of Israel," that is, you are the Messiah who was already announced. The Messiah was certainly expected by them as God to appear before everybody, as a king of Israel, even though they conceived him in a more obscure and material way. It was not possible then that the Jews knew how he was the Son of God or the king of Israel. Evidently also Nathanael did not say he was the Son of God by divine generation but by familiarity, as those people who came to God through his virtue were called sons of God. It was not possible that Nathanael immediately knew what we see and that the apostles themselves came to know after a long time. Those things that were said to him by the Lord could not be sufficient to demonstrate his other nature.
John 1:50-51 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.1.50-51
The Lord shows that nothing he had said was so great or sufficient enough to demonstrate all of what he really was. So then he declares what the greater things are that Nathanael would have seen.… He spoke of angels ascending and descending on him, because they assist him in dealing with the whole of creation.
John 2:1 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.2.1
It is evident that this third day should be calculated as the third day after the baptism. He said that the first day was that in which Andrew and his companion followed him and then passed the night with him. The second day relates the events concerning Philip and Nathanael. The third day points to the events of this wedding party. Clearly all these events took place in Galilee. Immediately after his baptism he left and lived there.
John 2:3 — COMMENTARY ON THE GOSPEL OF JOHN 1.2, 3
Perhaps his mother, as mothers do, incited him to perform a miracle, wishing that the greatness of her son would be revealed—and thinking that the lack of wine offered the right occasion for the miracle.
John 2:8 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.2.6-7
According to the will of the one who gave the command, the water was changed into wine, slaking the thirst of those who drank but also providing wine more abundantly for the couple's future.
John 2:14-15 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.2.13-18, 19
Having a symbolic purpose in mind, Jesus obscured his intent with allusions instead of stating plainly what he was doing. He thought that his hearers could not understand yet what he said. The disciples themselves did not understand either, as the Evangelist observes. They believed that by driving away the sellers of cattle and sheep, he abolished the market, but in truth what he meant was that the sacrifices of animals would be abolished.
John 2:22 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 1.2.21
Even though it is said that the Father raises Christ, the meaning of this expression is not dubious. The unity that is between them both in all operations causes both Father and Son to be attributed with equal rights.
John 2:25 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.2.24-25
If they believed, why did he not entrust himself to them? Clearly the words "many believed in him" are not said about a firm and true faith, such as the faith of those who, after believing once that his words were true, considered him as a doctor of truth, without doubting the things said by him. That kind of faith is typical of the true believers. But here, John refers to people who were astonished by the events that happened and praised him as a great and admirable man. In fact, not all of them approved his words by showing their respect for him to others. Such respect, too, is typical of true believers. So, he added, "But Jesus on his part would not entrust himself to them." In these words there is a particular doctrine of the true faith. Indeed, the virtue of the knowledge of Christ is revealed through which he was not cheated by the outward appearance of those coming to him. Rather by recognizing precisely each of them for who they were, he knew already who were the true disciples and who were in doubt and coming to him under false pretenses.
John 3:3 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.3.3
[Jesus seems to be saying to him], "If you believe that I was sent as a teacher from God, and the miracles I accomplished convince you of this, as you say, our teaching then requires another way of life and expects the beginning of a new generation." So we hope indeed to see the kingdom of God, because, while we are mortal, we cannot go there if we are not raised incorruptible after our death. We believe that this happens typologically through baptism: we are born again in an image of the resurrection, that is, of a new state [of being].
John 3:4 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.3.4-5
Since Nicodemus had asked, "Can one enter again into the mother's womb and be born?" our Lord explained that this occurs through both water and Spirit. He said water because the action takes place in water, Spirit because the Spirit exercises his power through the water. This is called the Spirit of adoption, not water, because we receive new birth through his power. For this reason in baptism we name the Spirit together with the Father and the Son, but we do not mention the water, so that it may be clear that water is employed as a symbol and for a [visible] use. But we invoke the Spirit as the effective agent together with the Father and the Son. That is why, in reply to Nicodemus's question, "Can one enter again into the mother's womb and be born?" our Lord answers, "Through both water and Spirit." Just as in the instance of natural birth, where the womb is the place in which the child is formed and then perfected by the divine virtue that forms it from the beginning, so also in this place, the water is referred to in place of the womb and the Spirit in place of the Lord as the effective agent. Baptism is said to be a symbol of death and resurrection, and so it is called a new birth. Just as one who is resurrected is considered to be created again after death, so also one who is begotten in baptism is said to be born again, because first he dies in water and in a similar way is resurrected by the power of the Spirit. The immersion represents the burial while the raising of the head out of the water at every invocation of the name represents the resurrection that takes place through the Spirit.
John 3:6 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.3.6
He means that the work of generating is necessarily similar to the nature of the generator: when flesh generates flesh, necessarily the generation is bodily. When the spirit is the generator, it is necessary that we understand the generation as incorporeal and spiritual. Through this he also demonstrates that the water, which he united to the Spirit, does not operate with him but is mentioned as a symbol and for a [visible] use. Therefore he did not add "what is born of water" but only says "what is born of the Spirit" by clearly attributing the work of generating to the Spirit.
John 3:8 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.3.7-8
The Holy Spirit, because it is omnipotent, performs everything as it wants, and nothing can resist its operations. You hear its voice, that is, perceive the sound of its coming. You cannot ascertain in which place its person is contained so that you might otherwise understand its way of operating. Its nature is immense, and therefore it is everywhere it chooses to be. In the same way, its action is beyond comprehension because it does everything according to its own will.
John 4:4 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.4.4
This necessity to go [through Samaria] gave the opportunity and the beginning to his narrative. John did not report this fact in vain. He does not say "as he went to Judea" or "as he returned to Galilee from Judea," so he also came to the Samaritans. Because of the Samaritans' separation from the Jews he certainly avoided giving an occasion for the Jews' just complaint. And so, he did all this as though he were passing through, so that those who were worthy among the Jews might not be deprived of his benefit. He acted for their benefit so that it might be thought that he did what he did there by happenstance. In this way also he appeared to extend good will to the Samaritans, for whom a mere passing through [of the Lord] was sufficient to recognize the truth, while for the Jews not even his long stay among them brought about any results.
John 4:9 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.4.9
It is evident that the blessed John wanted to reveal the virtue of the woman through this story. This request for water was not to be taken lightly. She instead first brings up the rules of the law. With great honesty she did not tolerate this infringement of the law even with strangers, even though it could have happened easily and almost necessarily [because of the thirst needing to be quenched]. Therefore, in order that it might not appear that the woman did not want to give water to the foreigner out of meanness or hostility, the Evangelist added these words: "Jews do not share things in common with Samaritans," so that we might know that she refused to give him water not as to someone who was a stranger to her religion but because she wanted to warn him not to transgress the rules of the law by being led by his thirst. At this stage our Lord took this answer of the woman as the right opportunity for his teaching.
John 4:11 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.4.11
However, since the woman did not yet understand these words and did not know what "living water" was, she said to him, "Sir, you have no bucket, and the well is deep. Where do you get that living water?" The tone of her conversation changed. Above she had said daringly, "How is it that you, a Jew"; now she conveniently set the appellation "sir" before her words. Before she talked to him, suspecting that he would have transgressed the law because of his strong thirst. Then, when she understood from his answer and his peaceful words that he had not asked for water because he was oppressed by thirst, she attributed the right honor to his words. "From where do you give me, [she says], that living water? You have no bucket, and the well is deep."
John 4:13 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 24
There is a great difference, he says, between that water [in the well] and the water I promise to give. That [water], after they have drunk it, extinguishes their thirst for a short time. But then, when it has been consumed according to its nature, it leaves the one who shortly before had drunk it thirsty again. The water that I give is such in its nature that not only is it not consumed and does not leave the one who drinks it oppressed by thirst, but on the contrary, it becomes in him like a spring gushing up forever. The water from a spring does not run out, nor does it need to be brought from another place or to be introduced, but it constantly offers perpetual nourishment to those who want it. In a similar way also the virtue of this water provides the one who receives it with perpetual help and will always preserve him and not allow him to perish. Therefore the one who receives this grace will never reach death. He said what he did for good reason, because this is what the virtue of the Spirit is. And so we also receive from him the firstfruits of the Spirit with the hope of the future resurrection. Since now this operation is performed symbolically, we hope then to receive the perfect grace when, through his participation, we will remain imperishable.
John 4:22 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.4.21-22
It is proper for Jesus to say now, "Believe me," after he had clearly demonstrated the truth of the words that he had spoken to her before. "The hour is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem." This, he says, is what you want to be instructed about. Know then that there will be a time when both places will end. However in order that it might not appear that Jews and Samaritans had to be considered equal (because he predicted the end of both their sanctuaries) he says, "You worship what you do not know," that is, you Samaritans; "We worship what we know," that is, we Jews. Then he adds, "For salvation is from the Jews." He did not say "in the Jews" but "from the Jews." In fact, salvation was not in them but from them because Christ in flesh came from them. Therefore, he says, the truth is by the Jews, but both sanctuaries will be emptied out.
John 4:24 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 24.23-24
God is of an incorporeal nature and cannot be circumscribed into any one place. Rather, he is everywhere, and it is necessary that he be worshiped according to this understanding. The true worshiper is the one who honors him with the right intention and believes with a pure conscience that everywhere he can speak with the one who is incomprehensible.
John 4:34 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.4.34
What is this work? It is the conversion of the human race. And quite appropriately, by speaking like a human being, he said that that work was more important than any corporeal food. He also said that he did the will of him who sent him because he had been entrusted with that work.
John 4:36-37 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.4.36-37
Jesus calls himself a sower because he has begun to teach and preach. He calls the apostles reapers because they have taken their start from him and have thus been able to offer men and women as fruits to God. Therefore he adds … "and the reaper is already receiving wages," that is, not because the impetus and start of the work comes from me or because your labor will be without reward—which is not the case—but because you will also receive your wages according to your labor. So the benefit is held in common: it is mine because I sowed, but it is also yours because you reap. You rejoice in gathering the fruits, and I rejoice in seeing the seed grow. The truth of grace is revealed more clearly in this as well because, through the seeds sown by me, such a great power has been given to you that you will be enabled to lead many to faith because of the help you derive from me. And the fact that, empowered by me, you are able to do these things again confirms the excellence of my virtue.
John 4:38 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.4.38
Even though he called himself the sower of the faith, the teaching of the faith nonetheless had its beginning before his coming in the flesh. It is obvious that it had already had a beginning through the prophets and the righteous ones who followed them. He also clearly shows that this beginning had been given by him as well. "I sent you, he says, to reap and enjoy the labor of others." After they worked hard to enable the seed of faith to remain among men and women, you came, and from this crop you gather them and lead them to faith. I would have not invited you to reap and enjoy the work of others if that cultivation was not mine from the beginning. Some I entrusted with sowing, others with reaping. I did so according to time and the different phases of cultivation.
John 4:45 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.4.43-45
After he had spent two days there, he continued his journey into Galilee, as he had planned. Not only did he see this as an opportunity, but he also often said that a prophet has no honor in his homeland. He called Judea his homeland, which he had left for this very reason, that is, because obviously the Jews out of great envy wanted to persecute him in various ways. All that [the Evangelist] said about the Samaritans was clearly inserted into the plot of his narrative. Among other things, Samaria was not the homeland of the Messiah. Also, the words "has no honor" could not refer to the Samaritans because they believed in him and received him with great honor. However, the Galileans, the Evangelist says, received him with honor as well, since they knew and had seen those things done by him in Jerusalem.
John 4:50 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.4.46-48
By writing here "believed," the Evangelist does not intend that he believed completely and perfectly, but means that he accepted the word without hesitation and hoped for something excellent from [Jesus].… The events that follow show clearly that the royal official had come to Christ with an imperfect faith. When he was going down, his slaves met him and reported to him his son's recovery. He did not come back to give thanks for the miracle but asked at what time the child had recovered. When he had ascertained that it was the same hour in which the Lord had promised him the healing of the child, "Then he himself believed, along with his whole household."
John 5:1 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.5.1
He chose the time when everybody gathered to offer his help to everyone. Therefore he went to Jerusalem at that time. He did not think it was necessary to travel around and go to every place where people were ill, so that it might not appear that he was looking for fame. Instead he healed one only and through him he revealed himself to many.
John 5:3 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.5.2-5
A great crowd of ill people, struck with different infirmities, had gathered here hoping to be healed as if these waters might effect something because the entrails of sheep offered as victims to God [for the temple] were washed in them. And God also supported this belief by causing the waters to move sometimes. Since they believed that the waters were moved by divine power, they obtained the grace of healing after they had come down [into the water]. It was not that many people were healed at the same time but that the one who came down first obtained the aid afforded by grace. [This happened] in order that the facility of the healing might not diminish the effect of the miracle. And so, because they waited with great attention and anticipation for the movement of the waters, once they recovered their health, they might have a better memory of their healing. Even though many lay ill there, he did not heal all of them. But, in order to show his power, he chose one affected with a very serious infirmity and who was hopeless already about his recovery.
John 5:12 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.5.10-11
The healed one did not know who it was who healed him because Jesus hid as soon as he had healed him. It would have been typical of someone looking for glory if he had stayed around with the one whom he had healed. It would have been typical of someone who desired public exposure. But we see our Lord cautiously avoiding this. In fact, it would have been easier to have himself seen as God. Since, however, he appeared as a man and many had this opinion about him, he protected himself from the opinion of those who saw him.
John 5:14 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.5.12-15
After the paralytic apologized, saying that another had ordered him to take up his mat on a sabbath, the Jews turned their rage against the one who had given the order.… When he pointed Jesus out to such an enraged and furious people, however, he did not act as a friend. Rather, in order to comply with the rules of the Jews, he betrayed his own benefactor. Nor can one excuse his actions as being done out of necessity because he felt pressured by the violence of the questioners. Therefore when our Lord came to him in the temple, he spoke these words to the healed man, who had [already] demonstrated his inclination to sin.
John 5:17 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.5.17
Here he brings up his Father, who always acts according to his will and authority. He too does not abstain from those works on the sabbath that are beneficial to us. Christ, too, knew that any time is suitable for our salvation. He brings up the Father, he says, in order to show us that this same authority is also in him. As the Father always has the authority to do work without being subject to the law—even though he has decreed the law of rest on the sabbath—so the Son has the same privilege. And there is no precept or law that might prevent him from doing whatever he wants.
John 5:18 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 25.18
If he had simply called God his father, they would have not grumbled. But he called him his own Father as if he proceeded directly from him and was equal to him.
John 5:19 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.5.19
Now, if he had wanted to signify a diminution of his strength and power, he should have said, "But only what the Father orders" or "what [the Father] gives him the power to do." But now he added, "but only what he sees the Father doing," which indicates similarity. Actually, if he does only what he sees the Father doing, he evidently possesses a perfect similarity with the Father in his action. And this would be impossible if he did not have the same power.
John 5:20 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 25.20-21
He said that "greater works than these"—evidently greater than the healing of the paralyzed man—had to be shown by him so that they would be astonished. Here he alludes to the general resurrection and to those things that he will do when he appears [again] to stand in judgment of all things. When he does this, there will be no denying his dignity. At that time, they will be astonished—and for good reason—learning who he [truly] was and what role he has been given. Undoubtedly, after seeing that, they will agree concerning the nature dwelling in him.
John 5:24 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.5.24
Actually, he tells what the benefit is for those who honor or believe in him.… The one who obeys, he says, my words and believes is made a participant in eternal life. Such a person will not only avoid the judgment, that is, the tribulations of judgment, but will even be held in honor, and certainly honor will be attributed to him by the judge himself.
John 5:26 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.5.26-27
The Father, he says, gave him his same ability to raise [from the dead] and conferred on him the same power to judge. And, as far as saying these things about the man [Jesus], he is correct because in his union with the Word he received omnipotence like the Father has.
John 5:28 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.5.28-29
But when he realized that such a lofty speech was quite above his visible nature, he added, "Do not be astonished at this." … By considering this visible nature, he says, have no doubts about what I said, that is, about the hour that is coming, when all who are in their graves will hear his voice and will come out. There will be division among them, and each will have his retribution according to his merit.
John 5:32 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.5.31-32
Since they were about to object to the words pronounced by our Lord about himself: "Your words are not true, nor worthy to be accepted, because you bear testimony about yourself"—since in their argument with him they were about to put forward this objection, our Lord forestalled them by saying, "You must not accept me as true, because I bear testimony to myself: this is what you undoubtedly mean. But you would have the right to say such a thing if I were the only one to bear testimony about myself. But now someone else said other things that were similar to my words about me, and he was a very trustworthy witness."
John 5:41-42 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.5.41-42
After he had rebuked with all these words those who did not want to believe in him, and after he had confirmed with different [arguments] those words said about him, he opportunely rejected the foolish conclusion that had followed his words by saying: I do not accept glory from human beings. But I know that you do not have the love of God in you. I have used these words not because I want glory from you or because I expect that your faith will be an advantage for me, but so that I might reprove you since you do not have the love of God. And, with the pretext of the love for God, you even eagerly persecute me as if I were vainly or even impiously boasting equality with him. So, I reprove you in order that you might turn to virtue after being rebuked. He then said aptly: ou lambanō, that is, "I do not accept" the glory given to me. My nature does not increase in dignity through the glory of people.
John 5:43 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.5.43
I [Jesus says] refer what I say and do to the Father, because my glory is the glory of my Father. Therefore I lead you to the Father and do not offer a pretext for your unbelief. But he [i.e., antichrist] will come and will not mention the Father. Instead he will do all his works for his own glory. He will tell everyone that he is god by showing himself to be great and admirable before all. And then you will take refuge in him, and you will stay firm in your resolve without resorting to the pretext of your love for God or the intervention of the Father. And from all that you do now and you will do then, it is evident that you act according to your inclination to evil.
John 5:44 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 2.5.44
Since I, he says, lead you to God without promising anything magnificent in this life, you run away from me because my words are difficult. But the other one shows all his glory in this life by promising great security and dignity to those who believe in him. And so you, enticed by the greed of this life, take refuge in him.
John 6:1 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.6.1
From here the evangelist passes to the account of the miracle of the bread, which all the other evangelists related as well. However John reports this episode because of the doctrine that was drawn by our Lord from it and that was omitted by the others. He believed that this (doctrine) needed especially to be related in his narrative.
John 6:6 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.6.5
Through his question to Philip, he intended to expose his disciples to doubt, so that they might observe more clearly the miracle he would do. Even though he appears to speak to one disciple only, his words concerned all for the common benefit. By explaining the purpose of that question the evangelist added: "He said this to test him, for he himself knew what he was going to do." "To test him," he says, but he means, rather, to provide the proof. Indeed, he first kept Philip in doubt and difficulty because of the shortage of food, but then, when Philip would see the miracle accomplished, he would learn that everything must always be committed to God and that he should never feel embarrassed because of any shortage.
John 6:10 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.6.10
"Now there was a great deal of grass in the place," and therefore the place where they sat down was pleasing, and the weather was good. It was Nisan (more or less April), when the earth usually becomes adorned with growing weeds, especially in those regions with hotter weather. He also had indicated this above by saying, "Now the Passover was near."
John 6:21 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.6.21
In order to increase the miracle before their eyes, he walked on the water and did not get into the boat. But the Evangelist says, "Then they wanted to take him into the boat, and immediately the boat reached the land toward which they were going." He records this in order to demonstrate that they did not take him but that, while they tried to bring him in, both the boat and the Lord reached land at an awesome speed. They could not doubt what the Lord had done or consider him a ghost when they saw that the boat had reached the land toward which they were going at such a speed, coupled with the fact that the Lord was with them.
John 7:3 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3 (7:1-5)
His brothers, being led by their human thoughts, spoke these words to him. They wanted him to reveal himself before everybody through his signs so that they might also be glorified through him. They did not possess a perfect faith in him if they believed that he needed to reveal himself completely before everybody concerning the nature hidden in him and that he had to be exalted over everybody.
John 7:18 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.7.18
If, he says, I wanted to avert you from God and draw you to me, it would have been evident that I was teaching you a doctrine contrary to God. But since I lead you to him through my words, it is clear and evident that these words that are said to you are just and that those who want to reprove them as sinful words have no reason to do so.
John 7:19 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.7.18
If, he says, you really defend the law of Moses, prove to me that you actually preserve it, and tell me why you want to kill me: this is contrary to the law more than any other violation.
John 7:22-23 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.7.21-24
Jesus then employs a very convincing argument: Moses, he says, established circumcision and the sabbath and ordered that men were to be circumcised on the sabbath. But Moses established the sabbath out of convenience. Indeed, at that time nobody observed it.… He also established circumcision needlessly because it had been already established by the patriarchs. But he established this rule [about circumcision] too, in order to teach that this observance [of the sabbath] does not exist when there are cases of necessity and that sometimes it must be broken. If the sabbath can be broken for circumcision, because Moses ordered it so—and this is not considered to be a violation of the law—why then do you think the fact that a man was healed on the sabbath is a violation of the law? And, he added, making them ashamed: "Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment." If a transgressor of the law is one who performs something on the sabbath, the first one to be blamed should be Moses. But if Moses is not considered to be a transgressor of the law, my action is the more excellent and I am even more above reproach.
John 7:30 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.7.30-31
They wanted to arrest him, but no one laid hands on him—as if they were prevented by divine power—because the time had not come yet in which his passion had to be accomplished. From this it appears that he could not be arrested by them if he did not want to be.
John 7:32-33 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.7.33-34
Why, he says, are you eager to arrest me, and why do you try to do something that is not in your power? Just wait a little bit, and I will give myself over to you. Indeed, after my death, I go to my Father, and by directing myself to him, I will certainly withdraw from you. And I will be exalted over you so that, even though you look for me, you may not find me. And even though you want to, you cannot come to where I am because I will be exalted over you in glory and honor. But the Jews did not understand a single word of this. And this is not surprising, because not even the disciples, as we have already demonstrated many times, could understand the words that were said at that time. At the end they learned these things from the facts.
John 7:38 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.7.37-39
Clearly they referred the words, "As the Scripture has said," to the sentence following and began to ask where "shall flow streams of living water" is written. But the phrase rather should be referred to the previous sentence. Since in the holy books there are many prophecies about the Messiah, as he had already said in another passage. Jesus, inciting every person to faith in him, means: Anyone who follows the Scriptures and believes in me will be filled by grace, and it will not only be like a river that never dries up but will also flow out of him, so that it may provide not only for him but for many others. And so the apostles, after they received the Spirit, provided for many others thanks to the gift they had received.
John 7:50-51 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.7.50-51
It is evident that not all the doctors approved what they were doing, since one of the doctors was Nicodemus, who replied against their words.
John 7:52 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.7.52
Nicodemus, either out of weakness or fear of the doctors, did not reply to them when they wanted to diminish the words and works of Christ by mentioning Galilee.
John 8:12 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.8.12
Do you not recognize the words of the prophet, in the fact that the Galileans enjoy a great light? Therefore, [Jesus says], "I am that light." And I not only provide [this light] for them but for all people. Whoever keeps close to me will not suffer; I have sufficient [light] for all people.
John 8:17 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.8.17-18
Your law, [he says], states that any case about which there is doubt is settled if two testimonies are given about it. Therefore according to the will of the law, there must be two witnesses besides the one about whom the testimony is given. If the Father and the Son, as divinity, testify in favor of the human nature of our Lord, the rule of law is respected.
John 8:33 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.8.33
They did not speak the truth. They had been freed from the bondage of the Egyptians, who were their neighbors, and from that of the Babylonians. And now, when they were speaking these words, they were subjects to the Romans. But our Lord did not lower himself to rebuke them about it, even though they were lying.
John 8:34 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.8.34-36
This is what he means: The subject of what I am talking about is not corporeal bondage. I want to talk to you about real freedom. In one instance a master, at his discretion, drives away from the house a servant in whom he sees an evil will and subjects him to any punishment he considers to be appropriate. But … no master drives away his son from the house. So, one who is a slave to sin, since he is far removed from all divine goodness, is given a perpetual punishment. But the one who has been made worthy of freedom and has been given the status of son always enjoys divine goodness and can never be removed from it. If you, he says, are freed through me and are made worthy of the title of sons, then you will possess real freedom.
John 8:44 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.8.44
When Satan, he says, speaks lies and similar words, he does not use those of others but his own. He is the father of falsehood because he generated it and was the first to use it by speaking to Adam when he substituted certain words in place of others. The expression "He is a liar and the father of it" signifies that he is a liar and the father of lies. In other words, the devil not only generated lies. He was also the first to introduce them and to use them.
John 8:53 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.8.53
Abraham and the prophets died, yet you say that you will make those who believe in you immortal. So, it would seem that you [Jesus] are exalting yourself over them.
John 8:54 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.8.54-55
Since they were openly rebuking him for exalting himself over Abraham and the prophets and since they accuse him by saying, "Who do you make yourself out to be?"—he in effect responds by saying: … If I spoke about my glory and the things that belong to me, you would not believe me—and with good reason, because I would be testifying about myself. But it is my Father who revealed my glory by testifying about me, as he said above, "The Father who sent me testifies on my behalf." You then say you belong to God, but you do not know him; you are not even familiar with him because you do not obey his words. "I do know him," and what I do matches perfectly with his testimony about me. Even if I say something pleasing about myself, I say nothing contrary to the previous testimony of the Father about me. This is what he means when he says, "And I keep his word. If I would say that I do not know him, I would be a liar like you."
John 8:56 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.8.56
Therefore, he says, after my Father's testimony about me has been explained, now listen to what is in conformity with that [testimony] about me: I am certainly enough of Abraham's superior that he also wished and hoped to see the time when I would reform the world through my passion. And in his desire he saw this, as much as he was allowed to, and clearly rejoiced when, by sacrificing his own son, he revealed his will and received from God the revelation so that he might know what would happen. As he accepted giving his son as a victim for God, so also God would give his Only Begotten for the salvation of the world.
John 8:59 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 3.8.57-59
He passed through them and left the place as if their eyes were closed by divine power so that they might not know how he had left from their midst.… Clearly, then, he slipped away from the Jews and, moving on, he performed the work on the blind man. Right after his discourse, then, one miracle was followed by another. This is so since, on the one hand, he was not seen by those who could see (because they were possessed by blindness) while on the other, he gave sight to the one who did not have the natural ability to see.
John 9:3 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.9.3
The Lord taught the disciples that there are many reasons for all these events and that they are certainly secret and unexplainable. And so, we always complain about events whose causes we ignore, but then we also learn that nothing happens in vain. This knowledge will be given to us in the future world, because what is hidden now will be revealed to us.
John 9:3 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.9.1-2
It was not unusual for his disciples to ask this kind of question about all that was happening to the Lord so that they could learn those things that lead to godliness. Indeed, since they had left everything and had given themselves completely to the Lord in order to learn from him godliness and piety, it is with laudable care that they took the opportunity from what happened around them to ask him such questions. When they saw this man born blind who, before he could sin, had this damage, and to whom this defect of the eyes happened when he was still in the womb, they were upset in their human way about this fact in trying to relate it to their faith. They thought that there was a just reason for such an accident and that such adversity had occurred not without good cause because they knew that God rules all human things. They were not able to understand what had happened in any other way because of their human weakness, attributing the reason for what happened either to the sin of the parents or to the blind man himself. It was not that he had been injured because he had sinned already—indeed, how could he sin if he was not born yet? But, since he would commit future sins, God, in his foreknowledge, restrained him by that disability. They justly and piously thought that the sins of people were the cause of all evils. But since, because of their human weakness, they could understand nothing more by themselves, they thought that the cause for this disability could only be attributed to the blind man himself or to his parents; as if the son had received that punishment for their sins, or he was the cause of his misfortune because he had received that punishment for his future sins.
John 9:8 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.9.8
After having gone and washed, he encountered grace. And yet his neighbors and those who were with him when he was begging did not all come to the same conclusion about him. There were some who said that he was indeed the blind man, but others, because of the miracle that had happened to him, said it was not him but someone like him. He, however, says that it is him, not because the event itself compelled him to but because he was eager to proclaim before everyone what had happened.
John 9:12 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.9.12
They were asking him, "Where is he?" His reply was that he did not know because he had not seen him, since at the time [of the healing] he was blind.
John 9:17 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.9.13-18
While they were discussing things, they turned to the blind man again, as if they chose him as their arbiter, and they said to him, "What do you say about him? It was your eyes he opened." Should we admire him for the work he performed? Or is he a sinner because he violated the sabbath? So about the one "who opened your eyes," that is, since he opened your eyes, what do you have to say about him? What is your opinion? The blind man wisely answered the question, saying, "He is a prophet," that is, that is the kind of respect I have for him, and it encapsulates what I think of the work he performed. When they saw that the miracle itself already testified to the power of the healer and that the blind man openly revealed the grace he had received and proclaimed the greatness of his helper, they began to doubt whether that man who had been healed was really the blind man or someone else. And so they were obliged to call his parents.
John 9:25 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.9.25
He says, in effect, I do not want to declare what I do not know; nor can I keep silent or hide what I know. I really do not know whether he is what you say he is. In fact, I did not come to know him as a sinner. I was blind, and through my hope I received sight; I know this first of all. It is up to you to judge whether a sinner can do that, because this is what you assert he is.He gave a quite prudent answer by moderating his words so that he might not appear to be in disagreement with those who questioned him. Through his silence he nonetheless suggested that [Jesus] could not have done what he did if he really were a sinner.
John 9:33-34 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.9.30-32
So Jesus must be admired, the blind man says, as one who is superior to human thought. While you do not know where he is from, the accomplished miracle openly proves his power to me. You do not know who he is and would need testimony from others if there had been no clue of his power. But if his miracles show that he is a great man—and you still do not know where he is from or who he is—it is evident, both from the greatness of his miracles and your foolishness, that he is beyond human comprehension. And from these facts it seems clear that he cannot be called a sinner. Certainly God does not fulfill the requests of sinners but listens instead to the voice of those who show honest behavior and faithfully do his will.… Indeed, he healed a man born blind, and we know that this has never been done before, not even by Moses, whom you admire.
John 9:36 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.9.34-37
The blind man, recognizing his voice—remember he had not seen him yet—said, "And who is he, sir? Tell me, so that I may believe in him." With good reason he thought that he who had given him sight even though he was beyond hope could also show him the Son of God.
John 9:39 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.9.39-41
What Jesus said elsewhere, namely, "God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order to save it," is not contrary to this statement. For there it states the purpose of Jesus' coming: that all people may be saved. Here he talks about the outcome of his coming. In fact, even though this is his will, that is, to save all people, the unbelievers nonetheless must be absolutely punished because of their choice not to believe. Here he indicates what seems to be the outcome of these events. As is only reasonable, he says, I came to test individuals in order to ascertain who are blind and who are able to see. Now he who was believed to be blind, twice received eyes to see. He received bodily eyes and, to the perfection of his soul, he received saving doctrine. Those [i.e., the Pharisees] who think they see with bodily eyes, who have been entrusted with the teaching of the precepts of the law, appear to be blind, both because they do not accept the truth and because they do not believe the works that they have seen with their own eyes.
John 10:1 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.10.1
Our current circumstance is a lot like the sheepfold: the thief comes from wherever it is possible for him to hide. His desire is to steal. But the shepherd who has authority to use the entrance leads the sheep out to pasture, and they follow him, knowing their own shepherd, while they avoid the others whose voice they do not know.
John 10:2 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.10.1-6
The shepherd of the sheep is the one who is worthily endowed with the gift of teaching. He is the one who uses the lawful entrance, that is, who lives with all his heart according to the doctrine of the law and so enters into the sheepfold, as is only right. Then he leads all the others, like sheep, to the pastures of doctrine by showing them the food of the Word with which they must nourish themselves first and continually afterwards. He also leads them by showing them the power of the Word, how Scripture must be understood and from which doctrine they must abstain—doctrine that others may deceitfully propose to them for the slaughter of the sheep.… The thief and bandit is the exact opposite. He neither uses the lawful entrance, nor does he show respect for the precepts of the law. This is how he teaches the people given to him. In vain he tries to take hold of the entrance and of the dignity of the teacher, even though he does nothing that is required for such an honor. He is inconsiderate and does everything without regard to how it may harm the sheep. Indeed how can he be useful to others when he does not exercise himself in the precepts of the law? Take a look if you want, our Lord says, and discern between me and you as to who uses the lawful entrance. See who diligently follows the precepts of the law. See to whom Moses, the gatekeeper of the sheepfold, opens the gate and whom he praises for finishing his work. See whose works themselves testify to his worthiness to be called the Shepherd.
John 10:7 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.10.7
He says that he is the door of the sheep because he is the principal access to truth for everyone. His doctrine that he has uniquely established calls everyone that is summoned by it. He established laws, as was his prerogative, so that we might live through them according to his will. And he was the Word through which all might know the Father. Therefore let us abandon the works of the law and apply ourselves to obey the precepts of Christ. Let us devote our entire being to the principles of the gospel and employ all diligence in fulfilling his laws. Thus, he very appropriately called himself the door of the sheep, since there is no other way to seek out the truth except by believing first of all in our Lord, and by drawing near to the entrance of truth through his commandments, finding pleasure in the good things we possess because of our nearness to God the Father.
John 10:11 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.10.10-11
So after giving evidence derived from these facts, he said to them, "I am the good Shepherd." Therefore, if I act against the thieves, not only am I not the cause of destruction for those who obey me, but I even invite them to eternal life. And so I appear to be the Shepherd because I work for the good of the sheep. Since he asserts this decisively, he proves his argument even more so, so that he may not appear to vainly portray himself as the good Shepherd. And so, with the intention of demonstrating this with different arguments, as well as the facts themselves, he says, "The good Shepherd lays down his life for the sheep." If, he says, the good Shepherd is the one who accepts suffering for every affliction of his sheep, since I am going to die for the salvation of the whole world, the testimony about me is beyond doubt. "I am the good Shepherd." Indeed, if the thief kills, on the contrary, not only do I not kill, but I also give new life to men and women after taking death from them. Therefore, in every respect, I appear to be the good Shepherd according to these facts.
John 10:15 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN, FRAGMENT 76.10.14-15
There is a different way of knowing. You see, I made them my own, for they are my own possession, … and they recognize me as the master. But then he also said, "Just as the Father knows me, I, also, know the Father," as if to say, I know the sameness of the nature and of the substance of the Father, being consubstantial with him, and he also knows mine. Nevertheless, I am not like the earlier teachers or like those who are teachers now, which is why I choose the danger on behalf of the sheep.
John 10:16 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.10.16
This sentence alludes to those among the Gentiles who will believe, because many among the Gentiles as well as many among the Jews are destined to gather together into a single church and to acknowledge one shepherd and one lord, who is Christ. This has indeed actually happened. But at that time the miracles confirmed the words; now the fulfillment of the words confirms the miracles accomplished then even though this did not appear at that time.
John 10:18 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN, FRAGMENT 78.10.18
To say that the body of the divine Logos also had a soul does not suggest the divinity of the soul.… In this context, when something like this is stated, we understand the statement to refer to the flesh, which had a soul and was united with the divine Logos.… After all, even when Peter says, "Now I will lay down my soul for you," just like the Lord did, there is no difference. You see, just as Peter, who was a man, composed of body and soul, said this, so too Christ, being one and not two, composed of divinity and humanity, says that he lays down his soul, which belongs to him and is part of him (although he was God in nature, assuming flesh—which had soul—and uniting it to himself).
John 10:22 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.10.22-23
This means the dedication of Jerusalem itself—not because the city was established at that time, but because the city had been destroyed often by the enemies. In the end it was devastated by Antiochus, and after the enemies had been driven away by the Maccabees, the city regained its ancient appearance with the help of God. And so, every year they celebrated the day in which they had won, in memory of the victory obtained beyond any hope; and they called it the "Enkainia" of Jerusalem. Then, since all people had gathered on that day of celebration, Jesus walked in the temple, in the portico named after Solomon.
John 10:28 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.10.28-29
Even though there are many deceivers, [Jesus says], "No one will snatch them out of my hand." It is impossible—even in the face of ten thousand enemies—that someone stronger than me may snatch them from my hands. And this is the difference between you and my [followers]: you do not believe after you heard my words and saw my miracles, while they, even though they may suffer ten thousand afflictions, will never recede from my presence. For this reason they will receive the reward due to their good will, namely, eternal life, because, he said, "No one will snatch them out of my hand," that is, they cannot separate them from me.
John 10:29 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 4.10.28-29
He referred the cause of it all to the Father, in order to confirm his words as indisputable to the unbelievers. And since what he had said could appear to be quite weak, that is, "no one will snatch them out of my hand," for this reason he introduced the power of the Father and his outstanding greatness by saying, "no one can snatch them out of the Father's hand," because all are absolutely inferior to him.
John 11:23-24 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 5.11.23-24
From this it appears that they, even though they believed somehow in the power of the Lord, were still in doubt because of the greatness of the task.… On the one hand, she has no doubts about his promise. On the other hand, however, she considers the task superior to human power. Indeed, we said above that they still thought they were speaking to a man who does everything through his own strength. This is why she said to him, "I know that he will rise again in the resurrection of the last day."
John 11:31 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 5.11.29
The Jews who were there to console her in her grief, as they saw that Mary had suddenly gotten up and gone out, thinking that she went to the sepulcher to weep, followed her as if she, being overwhelmed by her sorrow, might be about to do something that was their duty to prevent. This was ordered by the providence of God, that they came there against their will and became the witnesses of the miracle to be performed.
John 11:32 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 5.11.32
As Mary came to Jesus, she immediately fell at his feet saying the same things as Martha, "Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died." Martha is not actually said to have fallen at his feet but only to have come to him, so that it seems to many that Mary had a greater love for the Lord. This also appears from the fact that, while the Lord was at their house, Martha was intent on her service, whereas Mary, because of her great love, sat at his feet, as she did not want to be separated from her teacher even for a short time. Therefore the Lord exalted her in his praise more than Martha.
John 11:39 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 5.11.39-40
"Lord, already there is a stench because he has been dead four days." These words were spoken by the woman who doubted, but they also referred to the greatness of the miracle to be performed. Indeed, the more they knew that his body was putrefying and was in a state of mutation according to nature, the more the miracle to be performed for Lazarus appeared to be extraordinary. So the Lord by reproving her said, "Did I not tell you that if you believed, you would see the glory of God?" From this it is evident that she was not free from doubts even when she had said the words mentioned above and seemed to assent to and believe them.
John 11:45-46 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 5.11.44
The Jews, who were present, had different opinions about what had happened. Some believed in him because of the miracle, which he had performed. Others, on the contrary, were so far away from believing that they went to denounce him to the Pharisees, as if he had dared do something unlawful. But even what they did out of hatred and evil desire still contributed to making the accomplished miracle well known to everyone.
John 11:56 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 5.11.55-56
Many who had come up from the country to Jerusalem in order to purify themselves according to the precepts of the Law before the Passover … gathered together in the temple and discussed among themselves whether the Lord would come out of respect for the festival or would avoid coming in order to protect himself from the ambushes of his enemies. These were the words of those who desired to see him. With good reason the crowd was close to him because of the miracles he had performed.
John 12:8 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 5.12.8
If, he says, you are really sincere in your mercy for the poor, there is much time left for you to benefit them. There will never be a shortage of them in this world. But it will not always be easy for you to perform a service for me: I am staying with you for a short time, and then I will leave. First he purified the woman from the blame with these words by modestly saying that a greater honor had to be attributed to him than to the poor because he was staying with them for a short time. Then he reproved the intention of Judas because Judas did not care about the poor at all, nor should the woman be reproached because of the perfume she had poured.
John 12:9 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 5.12.9
The Jews discovered that Jesus was again in Bethany, staying with Lazarus and his sisters, and was in fact with them at that moment. Many came … perhaps expecting to hear something extraordinary from him, like somebody who comes back to civilization from a strange and remote land. For this reason the chief priests, when they saw that the crowd was also greatly attracted by the desire to see Lazarus, thought to kill Lazarus together with Christ. They obviously had the idea that the crowds would have not confined themselves to see Lazarus but by seeing him would have been led to faith in Christ—as if he who had raised [Lazarus] from the dead once could not bring him back to life again.
John 12:17-18 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 5.12.17-18
Since through Adam death came, which subjected everyone, they had heard through their prophets and believed that death would be defeated. When they saw that this had been done by our Lord, who raised a man dead for four days, they took branches of palm trees and went out to meet him as the victor over death, which oppresses humankind, and praised him with appropriate hymns. Since the Pharisees did not like this, they reproached them by saying that they followed him in vain, but it was their reproach that was in vain, since all the people went after him anyway.
John 12:24 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 5.12.24
However, he says, my death must not upset you. As indeed a grain of wheat is just a single grain before falling into the earth, after it has fallen and decomposed, it sprouts forth in great glory and produces double fruit by showing before everyone its riches in its ears and displaying the spectacle of its beauty to those looking on. This is the same way you should think about me. Now I am alone, and just one more man among obscure people without any glory. But when I undergo the passion of the cross, I will be raised in great honor. And when I produce much fruit then everyone will know me—not only the Jews but also the people of the entire world will call me their Lord. Then, not even the spiritual powers will refuse to worship me.
John 12:25 — COMMENTARY ON THE GOSPEL OF JOHN 5.12.25
Therefore, he says, not only must you not be upset by my suffering or have doubts about my words that will be confirmed by the facts later on, but you must also be drawn to that suffering so that you might enjoy the same things I do by suffering the same things I do. The one who appears to be so concerned with his life here that he does not want to submit it to testing will lose it in the future world. The one who hates his life, and in this world exposes it to afflictions, gathers much more fruit for himself. Jesus does not express this idea as if he wants to reveal here something about life. Rather, he simply identifies love for life as something that is prevalent among us as we seek to defend, preserve and protect our body and life from any possible danger.
John 12:31 — COMMENTARY ON THE GOSPEL OF JOHN, FRAGMENT 109.12.31
What happens, [Jesus says,] now takes place on behalf of the world. For the whole world is judged in me now. You see, the first man, having been condemned to death on account of disobedience, became subject to the devil. Likewise all after him, becoming evil, brought on themselves the devil to be an exceedingly heavy tyrant over them, and because of this they were even more impious, making the kingdom of death worse for themselves. Therefore, because no one was able to wage war against it, Christ, being God, able to do everything, gave himself up on behalf of all people, the ones of old and those who are living now.The world, therefore, is judged in me and through me. For, having committed no sin but having accomplished every kind of virtue and in no way found worthy of death, I accept death unjustly, so that in this way I may make my case against the devil, the one who himself killed me and was condemned. Having been freed from the bonds of death, I will rise, but I will also raise with me the common race of humanity by the case I make, and all will be acquitted of the verdict. He, on the other hand, who wickedly controlled the people in this life will be deposed from power. And the bonds of death, with which he surrounded people and was easily controlling them, will be taken away. These are the same bonds that caused them to sin all the more, as the devil attained a greater mastery over them.
John 12:38 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 12.38-41
What did he see? In the spiritual vision, in the revelation of divine nature, which is incomprehensible, Isaiah saw the glory that, since it is common to the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, Scripture cannot establish precisely whether it is the glory of the Son or the Holy Spirit, and therefore neither the Evangelist nor the apostle are in contradiction by saying that it is the glory of the Son or of the Holy Spirit.
John 12:42 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 5.12.44
Then the Evangelist said that many among the authorities who believed in him hid their opinion about him because of the Pharisees, because they feared they might lose their privileges and because they valued the glory of people more than the glory of God. What did our Lord say? While some believed, others did not even accept the accomplished miracles, others only came to know the truth through the miracles but hid their opinion because of their fear of the Pharisees as they pursued human glory.
John 12:45 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 5.12.45
[In verse 44], he said, "Whoever believes in me believes not in me but in him who sent me." He said this because they allege they were prosecuting him in order to avenge God. And so he says in effect, "I refer you to [the Father] because, you see, the one who believes in me is the one who comes to know the Father fully through me." That is why he said what he did there. On the other hand, "whoever sees me sees him who sent me" seems to contradict what had just been said. The statement in [verse 44] shows the difference between Father and Son, while [verse 45] shows their perfect similarity. Because the first statement showed such great humility, however, he logically concluded the second in order to declare his similarity with the Father. Both statements, however, show that he never stood far apart from the Father. The first he said for the unbelievers. The second was to indicate how precise his likeness was to the Father's.
John 12:49 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 5.12.47-50
We need to consider the purpose of the words. Indeed he means This is the purpose of my advent—salvation for all. You who do not believe will be condemned—but not by me because this is contrary to my passion, and it is not your condemnation I am after. Because of your [evil] mind you will be condemned by my own words which leave no excuse to the unbelievers on judgment day. These are the words that I spoke many times. In other words, I want nothing that is against the will of the Father, nor do I intend to establish a congregation for myself alone. I always led you all to the Father with my words by telling you that I was sent by him and that it was from him that I received the command to tell you the right words. Therefore I spoke to you words that were in agreement with his will. And this same thing I testify now to you: By those same words you will be condemned. Indeed you will not be able to come up with any excuses, as if you were defending the honor of God, because I always led you to him.
John 13:1 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.13.1
From here the Evangelist passes to the story of the passion. Here also, insofar as is possible, he is careful in saying nothing that has already been related by the other [Evangelists], unless the course of the narrative obliges him [to do so], and it is impossible to construct an accurate order of events without reporting part of the facts already related by his colleagues. When he reports those things done and said by our Lord to his disciples, which we do not find to be mentioned by the others in their books, he wants to show that our Savior did not undergo his passion outside his knowledge and expectation but by his free will. Only when he wanted to did he taste death.… In the same way here, by writing, "Jesus knew that his hour had come to depart from this world and go to the Father," he means that he knew exactly the time of his passion and everything that would happen to him.
John 13:5 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.13.3-5
Humility is the principle of all virtues: it removes any contrast, division or dissension from human beings and plants into them peace and charity. And through charity it grows and increases.
John 13:10 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.13.6-13
Simon did not want his teacher to wash his feet. The purpose of our Lord's action was … to teach you that you should deeply love and eagerly help one another. Peter did not know that that was the purpose of his action. So again our Lord said to him who was still resisting, "Unless I wash you, you have no share with me." Since from these words Peter believed that this washing of the feet was in place of baptism, and that from it he would have obtained his share with the Lord and therefore might say that he was entirely washed—if this was the present situation, the Lord corrected his ignorance by saying, "One who has bathed does not need to wash, except for the feet, but is entirely clean. And you are clean, but not all of you." Then the Evangelist by explaining the words of our Lord added, "For he knew who was to betray him. For this reason he said, 'Not all of you are clean.' " By speaking to Simon our Lord means to say: "This is not the baptism for the remission of sins. You have already received it once and do not need it twice, because you were made clean by the first you received. Now it is necessary that only your feet are washed, and soon you will know the purpose of this act." Certainly the disciples received the baptism of remission from John, in which the teaching of our Lord confirmed them even more by exhorting them to virtue. And then the descended Spirit perfected them when it later came on them.
John 13:19 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.18-19
I could not reveal what was about to happen, he says. However, in order that you might not think that I did not know the thoughts of those who follow me—or that I was unaware of what was happening to me and therefore striving in vain because of the shameful things that were happening to me—I foretell the facts before the event so that when they happen you will know who I am.
John 13:21 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.13.21-26
As in the episode of Lazarus he said that he was troubled in spirit, because he foretold what would happen, and that he was angered in order to show that he had knowledge of the things that still had to happen as if they had already happened, so here too he says he was angered because of Judas's betrayal and was confused by how vicious he was. He also said here the words "Jesus was troubled in spirit" because through the operation of the Spirit that was in him he foreknew the future [and the trouble that awaited him].
John 13:27 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.13.27-30
What Judas believed to be hidden and turning around in his mind was disclosed through the handing of the bread and made known to all the disciples. He was so far away from the admirable virtue of the one who knows the inner thoughts that, even though he had to feel ashamed and blush because of that public rebuke, he on the contrary confirmed even more inside himself the will of his iniquity. And since he was offended by the blame [he received], he prepared to execute his crime at once. The Evangelist rightly called this thought the entry of Satan by attributing to Satan the confirmation of Judas's will.
John 13:32 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.13.31-32
The time is near when the Son of man who was assumed will be glorified in a laudable way and in which, above all, God will be revealed before everybody through the things that happen to him. The events that happened at the time of the crucifixion, when the earth shook, the light of the sun was obscured, the darkness covered the earth, the sepulchers opened and the rocks were broken, showed how great was already—and how great would have been—the magnificence of the one who had been crucified. And, at the same time, they were the reason why people admired God who made the Son of man worthy of such an honor. "If God has been glorified in him, God will also glorify him in himself and will glorify him at once." Evidently, he says, God is glorified by those things that are happening in him as much as he also glorifies him. It cannot happen that he appears to be admirable because of him if the things that happened to him were not great. And they, he says, had already been given to him.
John 13:33 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.13.33
He references the time up until his passion when he says "only a little longer." He says to the Jews, "You will look for me," and adds, "and you will not find me," because they would no longer see him anymore after his passion. But to his disciples he only says, "You will look for me." Indeed, they looked for him and, since they were led by devotion in their search for him and saw themselves deprived of the care of their teacher, they found him. They saw him after his resurrection, and they lived and ate with him until he ascended into heaven.
John 13:35 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.13.34-35
How is it new? "Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another." The way to love is what is new. In the Law it had been ordered that anyone should love his neighbor like himself. But the voice of the Lord wants our companions in faith to be loved even more than ourselves, because he orders us to imitate his love for us. In the words that follow he shows that accurately. Indeed, in order to amplify the greatness of this precept he says, "By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another." So excellent is the observation of that command that it is a sign clear enough of my discipleship.
John 13:38 — COMMENTARY ON THE GOSPEL OF JOHN, FRAGMENT 119.13.38
This is not contrary to what is said in Mark. For he said, "The rooster will not crow twice before you will deny me three times." You see, as soon as he denied him, the rooster crowed. And as he denied for a third time, the rooster crowed for a second time, in some way bearing witness to the truthfulness of the Lord, as well as reminding Peter both what he said to the Lord and what he heard from him. Therefore, when he denied at first, by the will of the Lord the bird uttered a sound out of its proper time. But when he denied for the third time, then it crowed at the appointed time. However Mark, dictating the Gospel according to Peter's view, also said how many times the bird crowed during the denial, as if he wanted to establish more clearly the reproach of Peter by his own sin.
John 14:2 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6. 14.2
With my Father there is such an abundance that he can give everyone the delights of eternal happiness.… He tells us that here since the custom among us, when space is scarce, is to reserve a place to stay in advance due to lack of available rooms.
John 14:9 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.14.8-9
So, he says, was not such a long time sufficient to teach you about my Father and me? And yet you still are looking to see him. If you had known me, you would have known the Father through me and would have not thought that he can be seen with bodily eyes. Since the expression "you still do not know me" seemed not to fit in with the words "show us the Father," he clearly explains this by saying, "Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, 'Show us the Father?' " There is no difference, he says, so that whoever sees me sees the Father himself. There is a perfect similarity between us two that shows the Father himself in me. Very aptly he adds, "How can you say?" as he confirms through his open amazement the words said above. How can you ask me, he says, to show you the Father, if not for the fact that you ignore me completely? Therefore what I said is true, "You neither know my Father nor me. If you had known me, you would have known him too," because the perfect likeness would have shown him.
John 14:10 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.14.10
Among all the words said so far, especially here, he clearly shows that he talks about their likeness. Indeed, in the same way, by turning the speech to the Father and him, he reveals the perfect likeness of their nature, so that, as the Father lives in him, and he in the Father, a perfect likeness can be shown in each of them. Then he proves and confirms his words by saying, "The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own." If you do not believe, he says, in these words, know that so perfect is the conformity of nature, ideas, and virtue that there is no difference in the words either. Whatever I say is in common, and do not only speak on my own. The Father who dwells in me does his works. It would have been opportune to add, "My Father speaks through the words: I do not speak." But he had said above, "The words that I say," and here, "The Father does his works," in order to show that the nature is common, the words are common and the works are common as well. From this it is evident that through the words, "I do not speak on my own," he does not signify an inferior state, but a perfect communion and an inseparable union. And this appears especially from the context.
John 14:12 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.14.13-14
We said above that the words "I am going to the Father" refer to [his union with the Father after his passion]. After … this union, he will have the power to give everything to those who ask him, because by asking they ask for the greatness dwelling in him. He can give because of his [union with the Father], and the Father then is completely recognized in the Son to be excellent and admirable.
John 14:16 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.14.15-17
I will confer the grace of the Holy Spirit, he says, so that you may always have it with you to teach you the truth. He speaks of another Advocate, as of another instructor, a comforter. This is a doctrine for those in dire straits because the Spirit, through its grace, will make the afflictions inflicted on them by people lighter. And, as a consolation, through its gifts, it will enable them to easily endure their afflictions. This is what actually happened. Indeed, the more his disciples feared death before, the more they rejoiced in tribulations after the descent of the Spirit. He calls it "Spirit of truth" since it teaches nothing but the truth, nor can it ever change to the contrary in order to teach anything different from the truth. He says "another" in relation to himself, for while he was among them, he certainly filled the same role for them. In addition they received from the Holy Spirit the confirmation of all those things that he had taught them when he was present. Thus our Lord said, "But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come on you. And you will be my witness in Jerusalem, in all Judea and among the Samaritans, and all nations."
John 14:19 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.14.18-19
The world, that is, all the other people, sees me for a short time only, but you will see me again after my resurrection so that this vision of yours may testify that I am living again. And you will not only see me living, but the same thing will happen to you. When you also resurrect at the right time after your death, you will live and will participate in a second life. He does not say, "because I live" casually, that is, you will see me because I live. But he means You will witness the fact that I am alive, and by seeing it you will know that I resurrected from the dead and live and that I did not remain subject to death, as many believe.
John 14:20 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.14.20
Then, he says, from these facts only you will learn that what I said to you was true about which you now have your doubts. I said, "I am in my Father" concerning the equality of nature and the inseparable connection when I will appear so. And I said "you are in me" concerning your faith and love for me when you will be made a participant with me in charity and also in the gift of the Spirit. "And I in you" is said with reference to what the close connection will cause when, after being regenerated by the power of the Spirit, you are with me in the body and I am with you in the head.
John 14:21 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.14.21
Whoever loves me and keeps my commandments will enjoy my love and that of the Father and will obtain in addition a vision of who I really am. They will not be disadvantaged by the fact that they did not see me in body. Indeed, they will also enjoy that vision at the appropriate time as well when they see me coming down from heaven.
John 14:31 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.14.30-31
Great and powerful things will happen to me in the course of my passion. Similar things will happen to those who believe in me after my passion. They will cast out demons with a mere word, heal the sick, perform numerous signs, command the removal of all human tribulations through my name. Any number of different punishments will befall sinners. From all these things it will be clear that I was unjustly executed. But because of my love for the Father I accomplish his [primordial] will that all would be saved. The defeat of death that I will justly accomplish through the intervention of the omnipotent one will be the destiny for all humanity by grace.
John 15:6 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.15.1-6
The Father is like the vinedresser, for, if he sees some who do not love me, he cuts them off like fruitless branches and sends them off to the fire, but if he sees the opposite, he takes care of them so that they may bring forth even more fruit through the spiritual gifts he gives.
John 15:25 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.15.25
[Jesus says], If I was not engaged in dialogue with them in deed and in word, they would have something to say. But now, since they do not accept my words, they are clearly condemned for their enmity toward me and the Father. Through the prophecy he also shows that their hatred of him was irrational.
John 15:26 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.15.26
Through the descent of the Spirit, he says, there will be a confirmation of what I said, that is, that they committed a serious offense against me and my Father. When in my name signs happen through the power of the Spirit, then the truth of my words will appear. It will be evident that the Father was despised with me because of the iniquity of my enemies. And then Jesus, wanting to emphasize their fault on the basis of the person who will testify, says, "who comes from the Father," that is, the one whose essence is from the nature of the Father. In fact, if the natural procession [of the Spirit] were not understood from the word comes but, for instance, a certain external sending, there would be uncertainty about the spirit he is talking about, because many spirits are sent on missions, as also the apostle Paul said, "Are not all angels spirits in the divine service, sent to serve?" Here also the fact that he mentions it by itself is sufficient to signify the one who proceeds from the Father and appropriately is called by the name of Spirit in the Holy Scripture.
John 15:27 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.15.27
When you speak, the Spirit, through its testimony, will confirm your words with evident signs, as also the apostle said, "My speech and my proclamation were not with plausible words of wisdom but with a demonstration of the Spirit and of power." The signs that happened through the power of the Spirit in the name of the Lord showed the greatness of him who underwent passion and, at the same time, the foolishness of those who dared crucify him.
John 16:1 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.16.1
I predicted these things to you, he says, so that when sudden unexpected tribulations would occur, your resolve might not turn and fail but instead, through constant meditation, you might be trained through these difficulties.
John 16:7 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.16.7
"If I do not go away, the Advocate will not come to you. But if I go, I will send him to you." This indeed is the order of things, so that when I am in glory but you are still anticipating participation in that glory, you may receive the grace of the Spirit. Therefore, if I go, you will also necessarily receive through the gift of the Spirit the participation in the gifts that I enjoy. But if I do not enjoy them first, you cannot expect them either. And since he, by leaving them, shows that he will invite them to receive those gifts, he proves in many ways that the gift of the grace of the Spirit is great. And this is only right, because the Spirit provides all the gifts given to people.
John 16:11 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.16.8-11
So awesome is the descent of the Spirit—because it is so great and powerful—that through its coming down on men and women the "sin" appears of those who made attempts on my life. They planned to kill him who was worthy of such honor and greatness, as the gift of the Spirit among those who believe in me, will clearly show. Also my "righteousness" will be known, which I preached among them with works and words and with great righteousness and performed with equity. From all this, in addition, it will become evident that the divine plan concerning my passion was not useless and vain. Its purpose was to condemn Satan. Indeed, when through the power of the gift of the Spirit ill people are healed, dead people resurrected, demons exorcised, then through all these works the condemnation of Satan will appear. If I did evil actions or taught false doctrine, I would receive a just punishment according to my actions. And especially after my death I would be despised. And my disciples would also necessarily share with me the same contempt. But when the presence of the Spirit, with the accomplishment of miracles, shows the contrary, when it places my disciples also in great glory, then the condemnation of Satan will appear and the manifestation of my glory will be evident, whereas the sin of my enemies will be condemned. He referred all these actions to the Spirit in order to reveal its nature and power through the things that it does.
John 16:26 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN, FRAGMENT 132.16.26-27
Knowing that the Son is consubstantial with the Father, they would, therefore, petition from the Son what he was asking from the Father. By saying, "I do not ask," he indicated that he is God, able also to give "whatever you may ask," without petitioning the Father. You see, when he said above, "And I will ask the Father and he will give you another Paraclete," he spoke as a human, according to the divine plan. After all, why would he ask for that which the Father already intended?
John 17:1 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.17.1
Jesus says, in effect, You gave the Son the kind of honor that accorded him universal dominion—although he would have received such honor later. And what a great honor it was already being the one chosen by God! Nonetheless, he says, you gave me this [honor], so glorify me, that is, in a way fitting to the honor of which you made me worthy. Reveal me before everyone at the time of my passion so that through the events that will happen on the cross everyone may know the greatness of my honor. They will recognize that I did not deserve to suffer, nor did I do so unwillingly, but I did it for the greater benefit of all people. So the words "glorify me" do not mean "give me glory." Rather, they mean "reveal my glory" that was given to me by you. With the same meaning he added, "So that the Son may glorify you," that is, from those things that were done to me [i.e., the Son], you also will be seen to be great and glorious through me. The more my works appear to be admirable, the more your dignity becomes known.
John 17:3 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN, FRAGMENT 132.17.3
The cause of eternal life is steadfast faith, and to believe in one God, and to not attribute to others the title of God but to believe not only in the Father but also in the Son who was incarnated for us and was sent for the salvation of humankind. This doctrine expels the lie of the polytheistic error. It admits only one God while also surpassing the Jewish belief—inasmuch as the Jews worship only the Father. They surely do not understand that from the Father, by means of an unspoken word, his Son was born. It also teaches Christians to worship both the God begotten from the Father and the Spirit that is provided from the Father through the Son and is in its own existence consubstantial with the Father and the Son—the very one who is perfect life and the cause of eternal life.
John 17:18 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.17.18
The participation in the Spirit will not only give them the power to be freed from evil but will make them so strong that they will travel throughout the world and preach as I have preached.
John 17:19 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 6.17.19
[Christ says], "The reason I bring myself to the passion is so that through me they may obtain the sanctification that comes through the Spirit, and be sanctified and be empowered to preach the truth, being certain of the hope of the resurrection." He says that he sanctifies himself because, after the passion, he would hurry to heaven along with his own body and be in holiness.
John 18:11 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.18.11
The [sword] is not necessary, he says. I must suffer my passion because the Father wants this for the redemption of the whole of the human race. Therefore the words "am I not to drink the cup" must accurately be read in a declarative sense, that is, it is necessary that I drink it.
John 18:16 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.18.16
After he had showed his power through these things, our Lord surrendered voluntarily and was bound. First they took him to Annas, who was the father-in-law of Caiaphas the high priest. His disciples Simon Peter and John, who wrote this Gospel, followed him. John, who was known to the high priest, went into the courtyard without fear. Simon … stayed alone outside the gate because he lacked the courage to go in alone and knew no one on the inside. John, when he saw that Simon did not get in, went out and told the woman guarding the gate to let him in. Actually, John's frankness allowed him to be familiar with the high priest.
John 19:13-14 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.19.14
It was the day of preparation, that is, the sixth holy day of the week, and it was about the sixth hour. For those who think that the words of the Evangelists are in contradiction, as some say at the third hour, others at about the sixth, it is necessary that we say something in this regard. Matthew and Luke, like John, said that there was darkness at about the sixth hour. Indeed, Pilate went out immediately and sat at the tribunal and handed Jesus over to be crucified. And after he was fixed to the cross, the darkness began to spread, as the Evangelists said. There are any number of reasons why it is not surprising that Mark said that it was the third hour. He said this, first of all, because he was not present. Second, he was not a disciple of our Lord but learned these facts from Peter or some other apostle. And finally, everyone has different opinions about times and hours, and the doubt about the hours does not affect in any way the reported facts. In addition, we especially must notice that Mark did not say that it was the third hour about any specific and well-known fact. But by relating in a simple and general way the things that happened, he rightly said that they took place at the third hour and so designated the entire interval of time in which these facts happened. Then he added, "They crucified him." Therefore the sentence, "It was nine in the morning" refers to the account of all those events, which happened in the meantime. "They crucified him" is added concerning the previous events.
John 19:17 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.19.17
When Christ was condemned, they laid his cross on him. However, on the way out to Golgotha, they met Simon of Cyrene and transferred it on to him. In this way there is no disagreement among the Evangelists.
John 19:35 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.19.35
The Evangelist alludes to himself, because he always talks about himself without mentioning his name. From this it is clear that John was present at these events. It seems also that he wants to suggest the emission of blood and water did not occur so that everybody might see it but that it remained invisible to many. Indeed, he points out this by saying, "He who saw this has testified," and he means that he only saw and testified to this event. But he was worthy to be believed about this, even though he said that he only saw and testified. Therefore he also recalled the words of Scripture. Indeed, those events happened just like they had been written. So the death of our Lord happened in this manner.
John 20:1 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.20.1
It seems to those who dissent that here also the words of the Evangelists do not agree with one another. On the contrary, it seems to me that on the basis of their accounts their words are perfectly consistent.… Indeed, John says, "Early … while it was dark." The word early is not referred here to the morning. In fact, he does not say while it was "still" dark, which should have been said with regard to morning. But he wrote, "while it was dark," that is, on the next day when the night began, by designating with the term early the entire day so that he might say the day after the sabbath. The holy Scripture usually defines both day and night with the word day, because the sun, after its course throughout the night and the day, makes the beginning of the next day by returning to its place in the west. And this is confirmed by Moses, who says, "And there was evening and there was morning, the first day," which he also says about the second and third days, and all the rest.… John says, "Early on the first day of the week," indicating the next day, that is, "on the first day of the week, when it was dark," in order to signify that when the night began, the women came, in order to perform the proper honor according to customs.
John 20:15 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.20.11-14
And our Lord acted this way so that when she suddenly sees the one who she thought was beyond hope of ever seeing again because she still thought he was dead, she might not be overcome with emotion and think that he was some demonic apparition. He also wanted her first to speak to him gradually, as to a man, and after she had realized that she was speaking to a real man, she might finally understand who he was and at the same time might believe and admire the greatness of the event.
John 20:17 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.20.17
It is the custom of our Lord that, while his providence is preparing something, he seems to do something else according to the sense of his words. For instance, this is how he acted with the woman who suffered from hemorrhages. He asked, "Who touched me?" He certainly knew the answer. However he seemed to ask as if he did not know, so that the woman who had touched him might be afraid and manifest the miracle and show her faith though which, since it was adequate, she had received her healing.… And it is the same here as well. He first showed himself to the woman after his resurrection and was about to ascend into heaven, and by now he wanted to teach the disciples that they did not only have to believe in resurrection, because their sight testified to the reality of the facts, but also so that they might know he was not going to remain on earth after his resurrection but would also ascend into heaven to receive greater glory with his Father. Since this is so, it seems he says these things to the woman and forbids her to touch him as if she was not supposed to come into contact with his body in the same way anymore, since he was now provided with a different and much more powerful body. But this is the real meaning: Through what he said he wanted both to teach his disciples about his resurrection and his ascension. And this is evident from the fact that he showed himself again to the disciples who were in doubt, and he ordered them to touch the wounds on his body in the spots of the nails. So this is not the reason he kept the woman from coming into contact with him. And we cannot say that she was prevented because she was a woman; indeed, he allowed her to touch his feet many times. If she could not touch him because she was a woman, he would have forbidden her to do so even before. If he had forbidden the woman because his body had been transformed into a better state, he would have not allowed the disciples to confirm with their touch their faith in his resurrection. And then, if she also, by any chance, had doubted, like them, wouldn't he have allowed her to confirm her faith through the contact with him? If someone says that he did not care about the faith of this woman or her unbelief, this is quite foolish. But since he had allowed her to come to him then, is it possible that the reward that he gave her for her faith was the privation of contact with him? And does this not look hateful, especially to educated people? Therefore, with his words he revealed two things: first, that his body after the resurrection was in a stronger and more excellent condition than before and therefore was not to be exposed to any human contact; second, that he would be assumed into heaven, to be connected forever with the Father in honor.
John 20:22 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.20.22
With these words he teaches them the identity of the giver and the distributor of all these goods. His "breathing" convinces them to have no doubt about this because the body was created in the beginning as immobile and inanimate but then received life, which it did not have in itself when the soul entered into it through "breathing," as the blessed Moses said. After Jesus breathed for the first time, he mentioned the Spirit in order to show that, as then nothing prevented the body from living even though it did not by nature possess [life], which the soul by entering gave it, so now they had to believe that the body of human beings was made imperishable through resurrection, because the Spirit who gives it this strength is powerful. Therefore he said to them, You must truly believe in what has been said to you and must have no doubts about the resurrection. You must not reject the honor of the apostolate because you are scared of being sent as messengers of a new doctrine into the world. You will indeed receive the effect of the Spirit, which, at the right time, will confer on you resurrection and immortality.Through the Spirit, you will receive in this life an amazing, supernatural strength to perform unheard-of miracles by a mere word. You will be able to face easily any afflictions that may befall you because of those who oppose your preaching. And even though there were many other things to be accomplished in them through the Spirit, without mentioning them, he mentioned the most important argument of all. Here, he says, is what will clearly demonstrate to you the strength of the Spirit. Indeed, as soon as you receive it, you will be able to absolve the sins of whomever you want, as well as to pronounce a sentence of condemnation against anyone. If you, who are human, after receiving the gift of the Spirit, will be able to do all those things that are of God—indeed, only he has the power to judge—I leave to you to consider what the effectiveness of the Spirit is. Once you have received it, you must no longer doubt.
John 20:23 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.20.22-25
What truly wonderful gifts! Indeed, it does not only give the power over the elements and the faculty to make signs and wonders but also concedes that God may name them [judges], and therefore the servants receive from him the authority that is proper to him. The prerogative to absolve and retain sins only belongs to God, and the Jews sometimes raised this objection with the Savior, saying, "Who can forgive sins but God alone?" The Lord generously gave this authority to those who honored him.
John 20:28 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.20.27-29
And [Thomas] touched him carefully, and when he discovered the truth, confessed his fault by saying, "My Lord and my God!" What does this mean? While Thomas did not believe before that the Savior had resurrected from the dead, now he calls him Lord and God? This is not likely. Thomas, the doubtful disciple, does not call Lord and God the one whom he touched—in fact, the knowledge of the resurrection did not teach him that the resurrected one was God. Rather, he praised God for the accomplished miracle, being astonished for the miracles that he saw.
John 20:30 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.20.30-31
With these words the Evangelist shows that there were countless signs that the Savior performed before the disciples. In addition, he testifies that the words of the Gospels are true, namely, those scattered accounts composed accurately by the other [Evangelists] but were omitted by him. With his words here he demonstrates that he did not report those words without any polemical intention, but he shows that the words of the other [Evangelists] are true and are sufficient for the one who comes in faith and considers, reads and understands them.
John 21:15 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.21.15
Jesus promoted Peter and placed him as the head of the lambs of his herd and said, "Feed my lambs," that is, all those who believe in me and who, because they were instructed only recently, are weaker. And for this reason, it is necessary that you carry their burden, and protect them, and comfort them in their weakness and nourish them with the grace that was given to you.
John 21:16 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.21.16
A second time he said to him, "Tend my Sheep," that is, Simon, tend the men who are mature in faith and possessing proven wisdom, who obey you in the prescribed degrees of the church, in the apostolate, in the priesthood, and in the pastoral office.
John 21:17 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.21.17
The Savior does not say to him, fast, or keep watch for me. But, since the pastoral care of souls is more worthy and more useful to the community, he entrusts him with this. I, he says, need nothing: feed my sheep, and return to me the love with which I loved you, because I will take your care for them as care devoted to me.
John 21:23 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.21.20-23
Peter turned to the secret decision of providence and saw from a distance the disciple John, son of thunder, who followed slowly, admiring the great and sublime promise made by our Lord to Peter.… Since John lived long, that is, seventy-three years after the ascension of the Lord to the time of Trajan, and died after all the other apostles in peace and serenity by natural death, the Lord alludes to this by saying, If I want him to live long enough so that he may remain until my return, you do not need to investigate this. Only pay attention to what is yours, that is, take care of your work and follow me.
John 21:24 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.21.24-25
The interpreter [that is, Theodore himself] says that the words, "But there are also, etc." are not by John but by someone else.
John 21:25 — COMMENTARY ON JOHN 7.21.25
And here we conclude … this commentary on the harp of the Spirit, on the heavenly theologian and Apostle who is the friend of the glory of the Lord, the holy John the younger.
Joel 1:4 — COMMENTARY ON JOEL 1:4–5
In a figurative manner he wants to convey to them the impending troubles; as always, the earlier ones are surpassed by those coming later. Tiglath-pileser, king of the Assyrians, came like a cutting locust, he is saying, and laid waste no small proportion of your possessions. After him Shalmaneser [came] like some kind of locust further ravaging your goods. After them Sennacherib [came] like a young locust wreaking general destruction on the twelve tribes of Israel. Like some kind of blight in addition to these came the attack of the Babylonian, who took the people of Judah as well and inflicted the evil of captivity on all in common.
Joel 2:28-32 — COMMENTARY ON JOEL 2:28–32
Blessed Peter used this text in speaking to Jews on the occasion of the descent of the Holy Spirit. And rightly so, since the law contained a shadow of all things to come, whereas the people were granted care owing to the expectation of what would appear at the coming of Christ the Lord. What happened in their time was all insignificant and like a shadow, so that the account was given with use of hyperbole rather than containing facts. The reality of the account was found to be realized in the time of Christ the Lord, when everything was important and awesome, novel and really baffling, surpassing what had happened under the law to the greatest extent imaginable.
Jonah 3:5 — COMMENTARY ON JONAH 3:5-9
They could never have believed in God on the basis of this remark alone, from a completely unknown foreigner threatening them with destruction and adding nothing further, not even letting the listeners know by whom he was sent. Rather, it is obvious he also mentioned God, the Lord of all, and said he had been sent by him; and he delivered the message of destruction, calling them to repentance. When they accepted instruction in this, then, they were naturally told to believe in God; when they accepted both the sentence and the instruction from the prophet's sermon, they set their eyes on better things so as to give evidence of a decisive and serious repentance.
Malachi 3:1 — COMMENTARY ON MALACHI 3:1
I for my part shall come, he is saying, whom you look to as punisher of sins. There will be present also the angel who ministers to the agreements I have often made with you. When you seek him, you will find him punishing the transgression of your agreements with me. While the prophet said this as a consequence of what preceded, it is not surprising that the same verse was cited at the coming of blessed John the Baptist, the statement being fulfilled in actual fact by the coming of blessed John as predetermined forerunner and minister, and by the emergence of Christ the Lord, who came at the same time as he and was testified to by him and in whom the salvation of all people was destined to be achieved.
Malachi 4:4 — COMMENTARY ON MALACHI 4:1-2
In addition to all that has been said I transmit this final command to you so that you may keep in mind my law that I gave to the whole of Israel through Moses, having clearly stated that they must observe it in detail. The first token of obedience you will provide, then, will be acceptance of the coming of Christ the Lord, who comes for the salvation of all people. He will bring the law to an end and make clear his own way of perfection. It would therefore be good for you immediately and at the outset to believe in him at his appearance and acknowledge him to be the one that Moses and all the prophets predicted as bringing an end to the law and revealing the salvation of all in common.
Matthew 2:1 — FRAGMENT 6
The patriarch Jacob had already anticipated this very time precisely when he said, "The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor the ruler's staff from between his feet, until he comes to whom it belongs." Matthew brought these same prophetic testimonies forward in order to show from them that everything came about according to the words of the prophets. On the one hand, he showed that Christ would come from Bethlehem, as had been said by the prophet. On the other hand, he demonstrated that this saying of Jacob prefigured that this was to occur "in the days of Herod." First then those who ruled over Israel were from David, from the tribe of Judah (Levi's brother), until the captivity in Babylon. After these things the high priests themselves who held the leadership of the people were of the tribe of Levi, but their lineage was also traced from Judah. An intermixture had occurred between the levitical tribe—especially the high priests—and the royal tribe of Judah. Afterward, when the brothers Aristobulus and Hyrcanus came into conflict with each other and warred over the monarchy, the kingdom finally settled upon Herod, who was not a Jew by race, for he was the son of Antipater, an Idumean. And it was, in fact, during the time of his kingdom that Christ the Master appeared, when the kings and rulers from among the Jews had ceased.
Matthew 2:16 — FRAGMENT 9
He gave orders that not only the children in Bethlehem but even those in the outlying districts of the town be killed, thinking that amid the multitude of those killed would be the one he was seeking. Herod ordered those who were two years old and under to be slaughtered. He had calculated such was the time that had passed from the incarnation of Christ, taking into account the time the magi had spent on their journey and that which he had spent on the throne. But Christ was taken out of Bethlehem once night had arrived. It is not possible that the birth of Christ be the cause of the killing of the children. But the disclosure of Herod's child-killing marked the beginning of a long string of wickedness. Even those who crucified Christ were not wicked at the time when they arrested Christ. Rather, they became wicked at the time when they undertook his murder. Yet for Christ's sake the children will receive a good reward, fitting to their martyrdom.
Matthew 3:13 — FRAGMENT 14.18
Many raise the question, What in fact was the nature of this baptism with which the Lord was baptized? What did it amount to, the baptism of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, who, for the sake of the salvation of all, became human? As such he was to show himself to be the beginning of a certain paradoxical life on account of which he is called Adam, since for Adam's sake and for the rest of those who have arisen from Adam he becomes the beginning of everlasting life, in the same way that Adam was the original of this temporary and mortal life. This Jesus, I say, recapitulated in himself everything that pertains to our salvation. For just as he both died and rose again, we also shall do so, in the same way. Since necessarily we were to be symbolically transferred from this present life by baptism and settled in that life which is to come, he saw to it that this baptism should be fulfilled first of all in himself. In his providential dispensation of things, he had received, before all others, this baptism of adoption which is by water and the Spirit. He thereby showed this baptism to be great and honorable, in that he himself, first of all, truly accepted it. Moreover, he himself identified himself with that part of society outside the law of grace, in which we also take part. For it was fitting that the Lord, in humility of spirit, should become subject both to the prophet and Baptist, like a common person from among the people. He was baptized that he might hallow the waters and bestow upon us, through the basin, regeneration and adoption and remission of sins and all the other blessings that came to us through baptism, prefiguring them in himself. As God, however, he is the One "who takes away the sin of the world," and as such he has no need of baptism.
Matthew 3:15 — FRAGMENT 13
The baptism of John was at one and the same time perfect and imperfect. It was perfect according to the precept of the law, but it was imperfect in that it did not supply remission of sins but merely made people fit for receiving the perfect one. For this reason, even Christ, since he was perfect with regard to the law, was baptized with this baptism, that is, the baptism of John. And he makes this clear, saying, "For thus it is fitting for us to fulfill all righteousness."
Matthew 3:16 — FRAGMENT 15.32
The Holy Spirit appeared in the form of a dove, being kindly, affectionate and a lover of humanity. Although frequently pushed aside, the dove nevertheless comes again to be possessed by us and does us good according to its own goodness. For the dove is an affectionate creature, a friend of humanity, who, even though mistreated by people who snatch away and eat its nestlings, does not depart from those it is accustomed to live with but remains no matter what.
Matthew 4:1 — FRAGMENT 17
For since Adam met with luxury in paradise and, through deception, deteriorated to what is worse, it was necessary that [the Spirit] lead Christ into the wilderness in order to enfeeble the devil's force by someone greater in strength. So he fasted for forty nights and days.
Matthew 4:2 — FRAGMENT 18
When Christ "hungered," as it is written, then the devil made his move to tempt him; for he was not wholly amazed at the fact of his fasting for forty days, since he knew that Elijah had fasted for the same length of time. For this reason he took courage to attack him, thinking him to be a person of this kind, and not God.
Matthew 4:4 — FRAGMENT 20
If as God Jesus overcame the devil, it was no great accomplishment for him to defeat the apostate angel whom he himself had made. Nor is this victory to be ascribed to his humanity alone. But by long-suffering, he prevailed over him as man, teaching us that it is not through miracles but by long-suffering and patient endurance that we must prevail over the devil and that we should do nothing merely for show or for notoriety's sake.
Matthew 4:8 — FRAGMENT 22.49
The statement that the devil "led him away" has to be understood with reference to God's plan, since Christ, who had foretold and sought that he should do this, had prearranged for the clear defeat of the one who should try in vain to tempt him. For in the case of Job too it says that "the devil said to the Lord." But who is so simpleminded as to suppose that the devil discusses things with God? But what he had intended, God allowed him to do, in order to demonstrate Job's indomitability. So too in the present instance, to the devil is applied whatever purpose God had wished to happen in providentially arranging all things. But as to the phrase "he showed him," it is clear that he did not show him this in substance and reality, since it is impossible to find a mountain so high that from it someone who wishes can see the whole world. Rather it was through an imaginary image, in keeping with the demon's usual custom, the clear identifying mark of which is the attempt to delude people of sound understanding by representing to them things that are not there as though they were there and things that have not happened as though they had happened.
Matthew 5:15 — FRAGMENT 26
So, what does the Savior mean by the "bucket" under which some people put the lamp? Here by "bucket" he means vice, and by "lamp," virtue. People who intend to perform some illicit act walk in darkness, avoiding, if possible, the light.
Matthew 5:22 — FRAGMENT 28.21
In speaking of the judgment and of the council and of the Gehenna of fire, Jesus refers to one and the same punishment. He does not indicate various things through the difference of the words, nor some different chastisement. But if it is not permissible to call somebody a fool, why does the Lord himself employ the expression fools? It is not fitting to call one's particular brother a fool, for such a word issues from anger and not from righteousness. It is even more impious when it is spoken against someone who is holy. But the Lord justly terms as fools people who are in no way righteous and in no way what he is. He does this not out of anger but for the sake of truth. Again, Gehenna is the place of eternal and infernal punishment.
Matthew 5:32 — FRAGMENT 33.32
He has mixed his statement about divorce with one concerning fornication, for men who turn away from their own spouses out of a desire for intercourse with other women have committed adultery. The same applies to women. Thus he does not allow the divorced woman to remarry. The man she lives with must pay the penalties of an adulterer. For even if, to all appearances, she is separated from her husband, in spiritual reality she remains his body. At the beginning, she was joined and fitted by God to her husband as "one flesh." For the same reason, neither is the man able to marry another woman.
Matthew 7:19 — FRAGMENT 38.17
Others maintain that these things are said with reference to teachers of foreign doctrines and to people who mingle lies with the truth. Just as one cannot gather evil fruit from a tree that produces good fruit, neither can one gather grapes or figs from one that bears thorns; similarly, from an evil mindset, one does not hear good words, nor would you expect evil teaching to come from a pious teacher. But in protecting the others so that they may not be easily deluded, Jesus at the same time deters those who would attempt to teach evil things. For, he says, "every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and cast into the fire." Just as fruitless trees are thrown into the fire, so human beings who do not bear the fruits of religion with their mouths will consequently receive punishment.
Matthew 8:6 — FRAGMENT 41A
He uses the word boy here to indicate his house servant. Luke shows this clearly, calling him his "slave" or "servant."
Matthew 8:9 — FRAGMENT 41A
It was a sign of the centurion's intelligence that merely by thinking to himself about what was likely, he believed such things about Christ. For he says, "I also am a man. But nevertheless I am the lord over those I have received authority to rule. Therefore it is nothing strange if you, who have received authority from God, should be able to command illnesses to depart by a mere word." The centurion did not approach Jesus as one who is Son of God and Lord of the whole creation (for at that time, before the crucifixion, this was not yet known even by the disciples). Rather, he came to him as to a man who, because of his virtues, had received from God some greater-than-human authority. This is why he says, "For I also am a man." For since he had said to him, "say the word," and this might seem proper to God only, he rightly adds the statement, "for I also am a man," as though to say, "It is nothing surprising if you, a man who has received authority from God, should be able to do this thing, since I myself, a man like you, receive subjects and am set over them to command them as I will."
Matthew 10:24 — FRAGMENT 53
It is truly said that a disciple is not above his teacher according to his nature. For he who is made like his teacher by adoption can never go beyond his nature, but to be made like his teacher is the highest end he can reach. It is also for this reason that Jesus says there is only one teacher, and that teacher is himself. For the teachers among humans are more like routinely stamped images of teachers than like true ones, as each of them teaches what he himself takes for granted. One will make more progress if one is reconciled to the good that has already been given.
Matthew 10:28 — FRAGMENT 56
When Jesus says "hell," he is emphasizing that punishment there is eternal. By "hell" he means the condemnation awaiting those who receive recompense according to their life.His choice of words shows that there is a great difference between the two things. He first says "kill" but next says "destroy," and from destruction there is no longer any salvation.
Matthew 11:2 — FRAGMENT 57
About this text, some will argue, "When John sent his disciples, he was neither ignorant himself nor did he mean for them to learn, which seems clear to anyone who has entered to a certain extent into the meaning of the holy Scriptures." But this is foolish, because when John was about to die and join the departed, he sent them to ask whether he was the one who was to come and free those who had been vanquished by death. In this way the good news was delivered to his disciples as well. John had already said, "Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world." He already knew very well that the Messiah would offer his suffering up to God for the sake of all humanity. Certainly, if John indeed knew that Jesus was the Christ, he was not ignorant of the Christ. On the contrary, he knew exactly what benefits were to come to humanity through him. John might seem to be telling different people different things in different contexts. Isn't it true that John had so much knowledge about Christ that he said a great deal about him to various people? Isn't it true that in accordance with the greater part of what John had said in his own testimony, he recognized Jesus as the deliverer of good news? It is hardly conceivable that John was ignorant about the Christ but now was guessing and wanted to find out for sure from him. That would be inconsistent. And who would, in the attempt to discover something so great, send along his disciples as if they were competent in themselves to teach and witness?There is another point being made here. The present life is the time when we must conduct ourselves responsibly. After death there is judgment and punishment. However, Christ's death did not universally redeem the sins of all those who had already died. For when it is said that the bronze gates and iron bars were shattered, this is said because the body of Christ then appeared immortal for the first time and death was shown to be defeated. What does this mean, then? Were all people unrighteous before the coming of Christ? Not at all. Before Christ it was enough to refrain from idolatry and to worship the one true God in order to be saved. But now that alone is not enough. We must also know Christ personally. And so we must not imagine that someone will confess to Christ in hell, where even if all repent, no one is comforted.
Matthew 11:11 — FRAGMENT 59.40
If John is being judged against other people according to being born from a woman, he will be found to be the greatest of them all. He alone was filled with the Holy Spirit inside his mother's womb, so that he "leaped," and his mother prophesied because she partook in this as well. But if John is judged in relation to those who are to partake of the Spirit in the kingdom of heaven, Jesus says, he will be found to be least. Thus Jesus says that John by no means partakes of such great grace as those who will be reborn into immortality after Jesus' resurrection from the dead and that John will experience physical death. At that time, however, the Spirit's abundance toward people will be so great that no one who has partaken of even the least part of it can afterward fall into death.
Matthew 11:14 — FRAGMENT 61.55
Jesus is in effect saying: Just as Elijah will come toward the end of this present age preaching about my imminent appearance from heaven, in the same way this one has spread the good news of my coming, bringing an end to the old things. My coming is something new, a type of the state of things that is about to occur.
Matthew 11:18-19 — FRAGMENT 62
Those who were looking for the truth, he says, accepted the leadership of John and of Christ. It changed their lives. They managed this wisdom for the benefit of those who were searching. He calls the things that have happened wisely, wisdom. The Jews did not believe in Christ, either through the fasting and ascetic life of John or through the submissive mode of life and providential citizenship of Christ the Lord himself. Still, he who fulfilled everything wisely by neglecting none of those things that contributed to their profit and salvation was judged harshly by them. And no longer hereafter could they accuse him, because Jesus fulfilled all his promises and did not leave behind for them a shadow either of unkindness or of ingratitude.
Matthew 11:30 — FRAGMENT 67
How is it then that he himself demands a high degree of strictness? He answers, "You have not yet had experience of things that are mine, and for this reason you think this way. But if you would take up my yoke and would believe in those things I give, you would find the greatest difference between the things that are from me and those that are from Moses. From me there is great, patient endurance and kindness. Seeing such a weight of sins—murders and self-love and things more unnamable than these—I am longsuffering and bear with those who do these things, not despising them but waiting for them to repent. If ever they should repent and change their ways, I immediately forgive them, not remembering their former acts. But the law of Moses is not like this. When you sin, it immediately punishes the sinner. It knows no repentance. It promises no remission. When I make demands about the covenant, I am not so much preoccupied with investigating the things that happened. For me, it is enough that a soul choose what is good with a genuine resolution. But the law goes overboard, both adding more punishments to the smaller ones and cursing the transgressors. Therefore my yoke is good on account of forgiveness, and my burden is light because it is not a collection of customs and various observances but decisions of the soul."
Matthew 12:29 — FRAGMENT 68
Jesus here compares the earth with a house and human beings with vessels or possessions. Human beings have become possessions of demons and of the devil, having by evil means been brought under his authority. Thus it was impossible for the demons' own possessions to be taken away unless the demons were first weakened and bound with chains.
Matthew 12:34 — FRAGMENT 70
"O worst of men," he says, "you have not shrunk from any wickedness of vipers. So it is not surprising that you utter nothing good. For words follow the disposition of the soul. How can you speak good, when you are evil?"
Matthew 12:50 — FRAGMENT 71.19
He said these things, not in contempt of his mother and his brothers, but in order to show that he values more highly closeness of soul than any blood relation of body. For it was necessary to say this, both for those who thought that it was more important for him to interact with his own family, as well as for the instruction of those who were present. For just as he himself says to the disciples, "he who loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me," in the same way, I think, Jesus sets a higher value on his disciples than on his "mother and brothers."
Matthew 13:13 — FRAGMENT 73.13
It was frequently his habit to make use of parables for at least two reasons: either because he would be speaking about things unseen, so as, by the parable, to make invisible things seen, so far as this was possible. Or it was because of the unworthiness of the hearers, when nothing beneficial would come to them from the things that were said. But there was another, third cause for parables. Frequently, when he was saying something by way of refutation, he would by means of a parable temper the harshness of the refutations for the sake of the hearers, as when he tells the parable of the vineyard and says that "he will miserably destroy those evil men" and "will rent out his vineyard to others." In saying these things to the Pharisees, Jesus clearly avoided harsh language.
Matthew 13:33 — FRAGMENT 74.16
He calls Greeks, Jews and Samaritans "three measures of meal," for when the leaven had been cast into these three it brought about one same nature and fatness in all of them. For human beings, divided from one another, were brought into the same state by my teaching, in its working. The apostle also speaks in the same way, for "in Christ Jesus" there is neither "Greek" nor "Jew" and so on.
Matthew 13:45-46 — FRAGMENT 75
Many who were entirely foreign to religion immediately recognized, by divine grace, the greatness of Christ, in that they despised all their former things and looked to this thing alone, recognizing that the one who is salvation is for them. Then he adds, again, that many people, even of those who have been exceedingly zealous about religion, when they recognize the greatness of the preaching, shall turn aside from old things. Such, for instance, was Paul, who had displayed a great deal of zeal for the law, but who, when he came to see the greatness of the gospel, disdained everything having to do with the law. He himself says, "but what things were gain to me, those I counted as loss for the sake of Christ"; and again, "I count all things but loss, and count them as dung, that I may win Christ." He seems to have said this both on account of those Greeks who were devoted to religion and, again, on account of the Jews.
Matthew 14:1 — FRAGMENT 77.2
Herod the king is one person, Herod the tetrarch, his son, is another. After King Herod's death the Romans divided his kingdom into a tetrarchy, and one part of the tetrarchy went to his son. This is the man who beheaded the Forerunner and who, for this reason, received his due punishment not long afterward.
Matthew 15:5-6 — FRAGMENT 79
The scribes were entirely preoccupied with something else. The Lord instead was teaching them to take care of the needs of the body, so long as they were encouraged to cultivate virtue. When the Pharisees observed his disciples unconcerned about washing, they censured him on the grounds that he had not taught them with enough care that it was a matter of utmost importance that they not eat what they had not washed. What reply, then, does the Lord make to this? "Why do you transgress the commandments of God for the sake of your tradition?" Thus he reframes the question into an even graver accusation. They had not only broken God's command but also misused it for mistaken ends. The metaphor shifts: God had commanded that parents be honored by their children. That honor was owed to them to such an extent that whichever of their children sinned stubbornly against them merely by word would be condemned. "But you say, 'If any one tells his father or his mother, What you would have gained from me is given to God, he need not honor his father. You say that it is up to the children whether to honor their parents or not. You imply that a son says nothing out of bounds to a father when he says, "I will give a thank offering instead of taking care of you, my own father, and no further care is to be taken of you." In this way, by your own peculiar traditions, you yourselves are dishonoring the gifts of almighty God. Matthew 15:28 — in order to show that it was the power of her faith that elicited the healing. Even if she were worthy of even greater things, nevertheless that which she wanted was what was given to her.FRAGMENT 83 Having seen her advocates unsuccessful, the woman then appeals for herself and does not stop but in effect says to the Lord, "Help me, I haven't been asking this for my own sake." Then the Savior in turn says, "It is not good to take the children's bread and to cast it to dogs." He uses the term dog on account of the Gentiles' unclean lifestyle and proneness to idolatry, while he calls the Jews children on account of the fact that they appeared to be devoted to God. But he uses the word bread not only to speak of his teaching, which was through words, but also of that which nourished the faithful by means of signs. But in this case the word preceded the condemnation of the Jews, since when life in the Lord had been given to them as bread, they did not accept it. The woman does not complain, even when insulted. What does the Savior do? By his answer, he showed what he had premeditated from the outset. For it was for this reason that he postponed giving a reply: that the woman might cry aloud with this word. Thereby he would show her to be worthy of a thousand crowns. For it was not because he did not want to give her the gift that he delayed but because he sought and took care beforehand to reveal her faith. With his accolades he honors her as presenting a type of the church that is from the Gentiles. Note that he did not say, "Let your child be healed," but "Be it done for you as you desire,"
Matthew 15:36 — FRAGMENTS 86, 87
The Lord wanted to provide by means of this food a miraculous work for the sake of their faith. This was his will and they perceived it. This is seen even in their questioning him: "Where are we to get bread enough"? Jesus wanted his disciples' souls to be exercised in believing in his divine power. It was not only with words that he taught his followers but also with deeds. He then says that he "gave them to the disciples, and the disciples gave them to the crowds." It was fitting that this should be observed both by the disciples and by the Lord. It was appropriate that the ministry should redound to the glory of those who serve, according to what pertains to the service of discipleship. The goodness shown to those who are most in need, by means of the service of the saints, is kept as though it were an individual act of obedience. Note that they partook according to their need. They did not receive food in order to take it away with them. Fragments were left, as a symbol for measuring use according to need, rather than introducing acquisitiveness that goes beyond what is needful.
Matthew 16:2 — FRAGMENT 89
He exposes the rashness of their question, saying, "You regard the air as moving according to a certain order, so that by means of signs you are able to predict when the weather will be fair and when stormy. But in the case of miracles you recognize no order at all. You do not recognize any occasions on which doing or not doing wonders is appropriate. You assume that such a thing happens completely without order and without any reason."
Matthew 16:14 — FRAGMENT 91
In the same way they had supposed that Christ was Jeremiah. Perhaps they knew that the Lord had wisdom from his birth and was without peer in his teaching. Something similar was thought of Jeremiah, in that as a child he was singled out for prophecy and that without human training he was the prophet of a greater prophet who was to follow.
Matthew 16:17-18 — FRAGMENT 92
This is not the property of Peter alone, but it came about on behalf of every human being. Having said that his confession is a rock, he stated that upon this rock I will build my church. This means he will build his church upon this same confession and faith. For this reason, addressing the one who first confessed him with this title, on account of his confession he applied to him this authority, too, as something that would become his, speaking of the common and special good of the church as pertaining to him alone. It was from this confession, which was going to become the common property of all believers, that he bestowed upon him this name, the rock. In the same way also Jesus attributes to him the special character of the church, as though it existed beforehand in him on account of his confession. By this he shows, in consequence, that this is the common good of the church, since also the common element of the confession was to come to be first in Peter. This then is what he says, that in the church would be the key of the kingdom of heaven. If anyone holds the key to this, to the church, in the same way he will also hold it for all heavenly things. He who is counted as belonging to the church and is recognized as its member is a partaker and an inheritor of heaven. He who is a stranger to it, whatever his status may be, will have no communion in heavenly things. To this very day the priests of the church have expelled those who are unworthy by this saying and admitted those who have become worthy by repentance.
Matthew 16:20 — FRAGMENT 93
When the disciples had received the Spirit, then the teaching concerning the divinity of the Son was shown to them perfectly and the Spirit himself bore witness through the miracles that were done in his name. Yet it was still necessary that this be hidden from the rulers, the elemental powers of this world, so that Christ, by suffering and rising again, might transform in himself human life and recreate it, changing it back to the state it was in at the beginning of its corruption. This perhaps is the reason why of necessity this instruction had not yet been given them.
Matthew 17:11 — FRAGMENT 94
Therefore there will be a forerunner of his second coming about the time of the consummation. Also this time he is to restore all to true knowledge, restoring everyone who obeys him. The scribes deceived the people when they said that Elijah comes before the advent of the Christ. And this word was reported also among the ignorant crowd; that is what the disciples now ask. How then does he resolve it?
Matthew 18:18 — FRAGMENT 96
Well introduced were the words "whatever you loose," since he shows that if they loose those who repent, their action has power, since the church in heaven and on earth is one. Anyone who does not want to be loosed from the bond of his sin but draws it to himself by the alienation of the saints is alienated also from the church in heaven and accordingly is also bound by it. Hence, if one is earnest about being loosed and receives the loosing of the saints when they "ratify their love for him," as Paul teaches, he will belong in the heavenly church and be loosed from the bondage of the judgment.
Micah 4:1 — COMMENTARY ON MICAH 4:1-3
After the experience of the troubles in which they would find themselves, made captive first by the Assyrians and later by the Babylonians, such a great transformation would occur regarding this place that the mountain on which God was reputed to dwell would become famous and would be shown to be superior to all the mountains and far surpass all mountains and all hills on account of the glory enveloping it as a result of the divine compassion. Large numbers from all quarters, even from foreign peoples, would hasten to assemble to reach this mountain of God, on which God is believed to dwell, and learn how they should regulate their lives and live as they ought.
Micah 4:2 — COMMENTARY ON MICAH 4:1-3
After the experience of the troubles in which they would find themselves, made captive first by the Assyrians and later by the Babylonians, such a great transformation would occur regarding this place that the mountain on which God was reputed to dwell would become famous and would be shown to be superior to all the mountains and far surpass all mountains and all hills on account of the glory enveloping it as a result of the divine compassion. Large numbers from all quarters, even from foreign peoples, would hasten to assemble to reach this mountain of God, on which God is believed to dwell, and learn how they should regulate their lives and live as they ought.
Micah 6:8 — COMMENTARY ON MICAH 6:6-8
Forget about burnt offerings, countless sacrifices and oblations of firstborn, he is saying. If you are concerned to appease the divinity, practice what God ordered you in the beginning through Moses. What in fact is that? To deliver fair judgment and decision in all cases where you have to choose better from worse, to continue giving evidence of all possible love and fellow-feeling to your neighbor, and be ready to put into practice what is pleasing to God in every way. He means, in short, "You will love God with all your heart, all your mind and all your soul, and you will love your neighbor as yourself," as was said of old through Moses. Do this, he is saying, as something preferable to sacrifices in God's eyes.
Nahum 1:1 — COMMENTARY ON NAHUM 1:1
Something of this kind is the meaning of the word oracle: in his wish to give the prophets an insight often productive of rapture, God caused a sudden transformation of their mind so that while in this condition they might receive the knowledge of the future with deeper fear. He calls it "oracle," then, since the grace of the Spirit, as though suddenly taking hold of the prophet's mind, transformed it with a view to the revelation of what was to be made clear. He is saying the same thing here too: "an oracle of Nineveh, a book of the vision of Nahum the Elkoshite," as if to say, the prophet's mind was suddenly seized by the grace of the Spirit and transformed so as to contemplate those things through which he learned of the fate of Nineveh and which he provided to his listeners as instruction in what was shown to him.
Obadiah 1:1 — COMMENTARY ON OBADIAH 1
This differs not at all in its import from the phrase "Word of the Lord." Scripture calls God's activity "Word of the Lord" in reference to the spiritual grace by which the prophets received the revelations of the future. In the same way by "vision" he refers to the divine revelation by which in fact they received the knowledge of the unknown. They also received some insights in ineffable fashion through spiritual activity in their own soul. In response to the activity occurring within them from the Holy Spirit, they obeyed the word of instruction as though from someone speaking. Consequently Scripture calls it both "vision" and "Word of the Lord," and probably also "report" in that they receive knowledge as though by a report of some kind.
Obadiah 1:16 — COMMENTARY ON OBADIAH
For the time when God will punish everyone who did evil against Israel is at hand. And he will impose grave punishment upon you just like the punishment you meted out against your brothers. "For as you drank on my holy mountain, so all the people will drink wine; they will drink and ascend and likewise become nothing." Because you inveighed against my holy mountain and its inhabitants, you will not escape punishment. Your thoughts and your participation indeed will mean punishment for you and your murderous, traitorous allies. In the end, there will be no difference between them and nonexistence. Already the words "you have drunk" and "they will drink" signify an observation in Edom that other enemies will be produced. For "in the hand of the Lord there is a cup, and it is fully mixed. And he has brought this cup down and will pour it out. Surely all the wicked of the earth shall drain it to the last drop and drink even the dregs." But he remembered his holy mountain, recognizing the accusations of those outside against its inhabitants. Those accusers will be exposed to punishment as well as those who conspired with them, and they shall be punished with the death penalty.In Zion, however, there will be salvation and holiness. Jacob will possess those who possessed him. To you, O Edom, therefore, and to your council of allies this will happen. But Judah will be safe and sound. Indeed there will be no adversity on Mount Zion, because they will no longer seek after wars so that my mountain will be seen as a secure place for the saints. Everyone who was so much trouble to you, Jacob, and those who plotted against you will truly be subjugated.
Obadiah 1:18 — COMMENTARY ON OBADIAH
The prosperity of Israel was made manifest as well as the punishment of their wicked enemies.… Yahweh proved himself as a true king to his people because he brought the very salvation they needed.
Philemon 1:1 — COMMENTARY ON PHILEMON
The wearing of such chains would be a vile thing only if Paul refused them out of lack of concern for the salvation of others.
Philemon 1:2 — COMMENTARY ON PHILEMON
Paul makes a point of greeting Philemon and Apphia equally. He wishes to indicate thereby that in no way is there a difference of faith or strength of faith between men and women.
Philemon 1:9 — COMMENTARY ON PHILEMON
Paul shows here what power his name alone has.
Philemon 1:10 — COMMENTARY ON PHILEMON
Now Paul uses the name of Onesimus, but only after signaling the profound change that has occurred [i.e., Onesimus's conversion].
Philemon 1:13 — COMMENTARY ON PHILEMON
Paul indicates that had he kept Onesimus, the result would have been that he could serve Paul as an extension of Philemon's service and thus have been a source of gain for Philemon.
Philemon 1:15 — COMMENTARY ON PHILEMON
Clearly Onesimus's flight has served to reverse the wickedness of his judgment. The "perhaps," however, makes Paul more persuasive [i.e., Paul puts this thought forward as a consideration for Philemon].
Philemon 1:17 — Commentary on Philemon
Paul argues that what he desires of Philemon is consistent with the shared faith and shared condition of believers. The injunction to receive Onesimus as if he were Paul does not mean Philemon should receive him as an apostle but "as you would personally receive me."
Philemon 1:19 — Commentary on Philemon
Paul says, "I make this promise to you, since you yourself see the abundant rewards that God's mercy has in store when you exercise goodness toward Onesimus. You ought to think on these things in the light of what you owe to me, though I ought not to refer to it."
Philippians 2:7 — EPISTLE TO THE PHILIPPIANS 2.2
By "emptying" the holy Scripture signifies becoming of no account, just as in Corinthians Paul speaks of faith as if it had been made of no account, or emptied of significance, if Christ be not raised. So "our preaching has been made empty" means that it is of no account and futile.… Thus the phrase "he emptied himself" means that he did not yet reveal himself. Assuming the form of a slave, he concealed that dignity which was his. So he was deemed by onlookers to be what he seemed.
Psalms 1:2 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 1:2
One learns to be bound by the law through continuous meditation so that one shapes himself by it.
Psalms 2:6 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 2:6
Truly, God did not establish the Word as King at that time, whose power did not just begin at a point but who was and always is powerful, who as in his nature had power to create whatever he wished; so also in his nature he had power rightly so to rule over all things that were made by him.
Psalms 2:9 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 2:9
Are not, therefore, those words that were spoken by blessed David appropriately applied to the Lord whose kingdom extends to the farthest outposts of the earth and the whole world? [It is he] who, like the rod, threatens and punishes the broken condition of the nations and of the Jews, not in order to destroy them but in order to bring them back together and reshape them, as when the old man is put off and the new man takes his place through the sacrament of baptism. David really said this: "just like a pot of clay you will break them," showing the parallel, since by their contrition there had been no destruction, but a renewal was about to follow. This is likened to the intention of every potter: that the vases, if they do not follow the will and hand of the one making them, while they are yet new and not hardened by the kiln, the potter breaks them and puts them back on the wheel to be re-formed.
Psalms 2:11 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 2:11
He wants devotion, not coercion … because to obey is more sublime than to yield simply to duty.
Psalms 3:3 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 3:4
The strength of a stable spirit that is greatly tested in adversity must be considered because, since it possesses hope, even amidst the greatest anguish it does not yield. Those, I say, who mock me say such things to increase my grief. I will not stop hoping in what I have believed because you, Lord, help me as I labor. You guard my step from the danger of evil. You restore my honor and worth.
Psalms 3:4 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 3:5
It is the greatest faith that allows no hesitation for seeking the help of God for himself and that approaches with confidence of his demand.
Psalms 3:6 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 3:7
In this verse the psalmist is not moved by his own trials to the point of despairing of the help of God, nor is he dissuaded from a position of faith by words of reproach. He, having learned by experience the fullness of previous help, cries out most confidently after the kindnesses of God toward him through which he is freed from all of the entangling of his troubles: "I will not fear ten thousands surrounding me."
Psalms 3:8 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 3:9
What is this blessing of the Lord? Without a doubt it is peace, just as Scripture says in many places: "Peace be over Israel." Through these words he wishes to show that in the place of blessing peace is conferred on the people.
Psalms 4:1 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 4:2
One who seeks mercy from God shows clearly that he does not demand the fruit of his own merit and the debt of his own zeal but that he wishes to benefit from the patience and kindness of God.
Psalms 4:3 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 4:4
When there is a burdensome care, however many times I call out to God, he does not delay to hear me: this establishes, therefore, as an example to me and others, his providence. However, it is the custom of those who are bound by their miseries, who are pushed into the folly of bitterness, to complain against God and to say that he shows no concern for the affairs of mortals, nor does he govern human life with reason.
Psalms 4:4 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 4:5
After he said, "Be angry," he added, "And sin not." I propose it in the form of a question, as if he had said, "Are you angry? Sin not." Although one struggles confused and trapped in the offense of a disturbed spirit because of present affairs, although there seem to be so many causes for indignation, nevertheless do not think that it is true what reason and discipline hand over to us, but the spirit disturbed by wrath presses on us. It is the greatest testimony that your own opinion lacks truth because those things that you know, that you speak, have not come from reason but from your experience.
Psalms 25:4 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 25:4
As he refers by "way" to people's actions and exploits (as in that verse, "I have run in the way of your commands," as if to say, I determined to do and observe your commands), so he calls God's "way" whatever God deigns to do by creating or arranging. So "teach me your paths" means "make me rejoice in your acting and planning."
Psalms 25:8 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 25:8
Mercy is customary with God; righteousness is his constant concern. Often, in fact, he obscures sin with a show of his goodness, and he does not submit individuals' behavior to harsh scrutiny; rather, when he sees some people persisting in their errors without amendment, he applies the rigor of justice and chastises them for the purpose of correcting them, and by the bitterness of the blows he brings the errant ones back to a life of discipline.
Psalms 25:10 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 25:10
These are the ways of the Lord. Now, he habitually links truth and mercy, as if to say, this is God's work, this his way, this his action, to accord secure and true salvation to those he has chosen.
Psalms 25:21 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 25:21
Placing my hope in you, I took pains to be such a person that innocent people might associate with me and take pleasure in my company.
Psalms 26:1 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 26:1
It is not to be read, as some commentators claim, "Judge me, Lord," for if it is read "Judge me," it gives quite a different sense, as though to say, condemn me, as also in Psalm 5 he appealed in the words "Condemn them, Lord," which is not appropriate for a suppliant to ask for in his own case. So it is to be read as "Give me a just verdict" … because I did not swerve from my innocent purpose, nor did I have any doubts about the hope I placed in you.
Psalms 30:5 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 30:6
By "wrath" he refers to punishment and retribution, by "wrath" the divine Scripture meaning not only the initial response but also lasting anger. So by "wrath" he refers to the awful process of vengeance, and by "anger" the effect it rightly has on sinners, the terms being interchanged as usual.… He takes vengeance when angered and is beneficent by purpose and intention.
Psalms 31:5 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 31:6
Now, it is to be noted that the Lord cited this verse when on the cross, not that it was said of him in prophetic manner, as some commentators think, but because these words suited him when exposed to the risk of death and passion. So he cited this verse at the time when his soul was separated from his body, and [he] rightly entrusted it to the Father so that he might restore it to his body when it was in need of it at the time of the resurrection.
Psalms 31:6 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 31:7
You hated them and rebuffed those paying constant attention to doing wrong; far from doing evil in the heat of passion, they involve themselves in the practice of evil as though an obligation (the sense of "paid constant attention"). By "futile things" he refers to the wrongdoing. By "in vain" he means that they got no benefit from their involvement in evildoing because of his hating and punishing them and not allowing them to bring to completion the object of their efforts.
Psalms 33:4 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 33:4B
Everything done by [God] is firm and permanent. The insertion of both these phrases was necessary in the light of the foregoing: he had to recommend thanksgiving and show the justice of the victory and the permanence of the gift so that the thanksgiving and hymn singing to him would emerge as a response to both, the provision of just assistance and the gift of abiding beneficence. He is saying, then, that both these features characterize what is done by God, and if either is missing, the level of thanksgiving could be diminished. That is to say, if the assistance were unjust, it would not be appropriate to offer thanks on their behalf, even though thanks are due for what is received, or if it underwent rapid change, it thus would be unnecessary to give thanks for good things that do not last.
Psalms 33:5 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 33:5A
Grace and righteousness are characteristic of what is done by God. In other words, he said that loving is characteristic of him, speaking perhaps excessively and meaning that not only does what has been done in the past have these two characteristics, but also he is very fond of doing such things as happen to have these two characteristics.
Psalms 33:6 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 33:6B
You see, when it says "mouth" in these cases, it intends to indicate an operation affecting visible creation, as when it also says "hand" and "feet" and the like. Elsewhere, too, Scripture says, "The mouth of the Lord said this," in the sense that God revealed what had been determined in our regard; nowhere does the divine Scripture by such corporeal expression describe the Lord's nature or the creation of invisible nature, such as angels and the like, as in our case it is in the habit of saying, "Your hands made me." So by "breath of his mouth" he means "by his decision."
Psalms 33:11 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 33:10B, C-11
Even if a vast number were scheming, while God wanted the opposite, the vast number would be of no significance to the schemes. Even if rulers planned something, the object of their concern would come to nothing, and they would get no benefit from the government or the vast number of the subjects. Then the more important consideration.… Not only can [God] render the schemes of others ineffectual, but also he can bring great reliability to his own. Now, "thoughts of his heart" is a bodily expression by which he refers to God's determined limit and authoritative decree, as if to say, Such a decision of the Lord is irrevocable.
Psalms 33:12 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 33:12
You the people chosen by him are fortunate for the reason that the Lord's kindness to you is unchanging.
Psalms 33:15 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 33:15
Some commentators thought that here blessed David means that he individually formed people's souls apart from their body, as though "hearts" meant "souls." Whether this is so or not (it is a topic requiring fuller treatment), here it does not have that sense. Rather, "their hearts" means "them," referring to the whole from the part. So "he forms them individually" means that none of humankind was in existence, as if to say, when they did not exist, he produced them.
Psalms 33:20 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 33:20A
[God] is always helping and providing us with salvation. The term "protector," you see, is a metaphor from those thrusting their own shields among the enemy and by protection from these often sheltering others and freeing them from every disaster.
Psalms 34:15 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 34:16A-17B
God takes care of the righteous (by "eyes" referring not simply to sight but also to what is done by God in beneficence and providence).… He also accepts their requests.… But he has an eye also for the wicked, though not in the same way as for the good. To what effect? "To destroy remembrance of them from the land": … God gives evidence of great care for the righteous, accepting their supplication while completely disregarding those guilty of wrong actions and inflicting destruction on them.
Psalms 34:18 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 34:19B
He did not apply the terms "lowly" and "contrite of heart" simply to those reduced to this condition from the disasters but to those in this condition by intent and resolve. Even if tested by disasters, on the basis of their lowliness of intent they thought that they received their just deserts, asked God with due reverence for help and received it by gift. So it is clear from this that even by saying above "let the gentle hear and be glad" he refers neither to those humbled of necessity by disasters nor to those in this condition by nature, whom the general run of good people like to think gentle, but to those in this condition in heart and purpose, who emerge by their zeal in bearing nobly the wrongs done them since they look to God for help. This, in fact, is gentleness, not being insensitive or keeping complete silence while ignoring sensation even in situations that are often unavoidable, when it is possible to effect a greater good.
Psalms 34:19 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 34:20-21
It often happens that the righteous are put to the test in extreme troubles and severe tribulations.… Even if they are tested by many troubles and many tribulations, God allowing this to their advantage, he nevertheless definitely frees them from the troubles, not allowing them to be overcome by the disasters in the end.… He rescues them after allowing the tribulations for a while to their advantage, keeps those in the midst of tribulations free from harm and preserves their strength completely.
Psalms 34:21 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 34:22B
Not only do sinners meet such a fate, but also those hostile to the righteous will fall foul of troubles. Now, he says this to bring out the extent of the providence that God shows for the righteous. "Will come to grief" means that they will stumble, will trip up, will fail in their hostile intent against the righteous by being punished by God; "come to grief" meaning "missing the mark," which means failing to achieve a purpose and intent at odds with that prescribed—hence our calling a wrong action a sin as being at odds with the proper intention.
Psalms 35:10 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 35:10B, c
I shall say no one is like you, he means, and shall confess you to be more powerful than everyone, even those considered strong and powerful; you are capable of rescuing the poor and insignificant and delivering them from their scheming against the odds.… You see, both the insignificance by comparison with him of the one who suffers and is rescued and also the might of the schemers brought out his greatness: the more effective the release from the schemers was shown to be, the more powerful did the one who effected it appear.
Psalms 35:20 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 35:20
They make a pretense by uttering words under the guise of peace, but in reality their words are completely full of anger and evil. All the words, in fact, were not of peace, though they seemed to give that impression; rather, they were spoken with complete viciousness under pretense, for they continued hatching plots and schemes against me, planning such things and turning them over in their soul.
Psalms 36:1 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 36:2A
The lawbreaker thinks his sinning is [hidden] within—that is, he believes that he is escaping notice in sinning.… Now, it is typical of the person employing deceit to think that schemers escape notice, because they are always under that impression when they use flattering language; after all, unless they expected to escape notice, they would not have persisted in their deceitful pretense.
Psalms 36:2 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 36:3A
If he had "the fear of God before his eyes," he would not have employed deceit in the belief that he was escaping our notice (realizing that it was not possible to escape God, everything being known to him, who knows and understands everything clearly). If he really had dread of the Lord, he would have shown much zeal in guarding against sin.
Psalms 36:6 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 36:7B
His decisions and decrees, which he applies in judging and examining human beings, are immeasurable, like the deep. Thus, it is impossible to find out why he allows righteous people often to suffer at the hands of the unrighteous, as I find happening in my own case. While the fact that his care and providence for us is wonderful is clear from his never allowing our sufferings to be unbearable, I am unable to discover precisely why he does not leave us in perfect peace but permits us for a time to be pursued unjustly by them. Hence, "your judgments" strike me as more inaccessible than any "deep."
Psalms 36:9 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 36:10A, B
You flood us with life, abundantly supplying us with it from the great number and variety of what is given us by you for sustenance and life.… Without light we can see nothing that exists, for when we are deprived of light and plunged into darkness, we have no recognition of what is at hand; whereas when light is available, we see and discern by recognition. So for discerning other things we need light, whereas light itself requires nothing else any longer for our being able to see; instead, with the aid of light itself we succeed in seeing everything through light and discern everything, including even light itself.… His meaning was to present the utter generosity and abundance of God's gift—thus his mention of these two things in particular: the light (he made clear that from it he provided us both with existence itself and with sustenance) and enjoyment of the light, through which he conveyed the pleasure of life.
Psalms 36:10 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 36:11A
They were formed by you so as to be able, if they wished, both to know you and to hope in you, and to enjoy the good things stemming from this.
Psalms 37:9 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 37:8B-9A
Do not consider blessed those people for being in a position even to do whatever they wish, nor with your eyes on their suffering no harsh fate decide to attempt at any time in your own case to do some wrong. "Because the evildoers will be wiped out": those guilty of wickedness will some day pay the full penalty and perish.
Psalms 37:15 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 37:15
Even if the sinner tries to plot against the righteous person and is bent on carrying it through in every way, do not then grind your teeth at his going unpunished. God will spit on his plot, knowing that he will suffer sometime and that it is he who will sustain harm from his plot against the righteous.
Psalms 37:34 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 37:34A-C
Since, then, God does not allow the righteous, even if vulnerable to sinners, to be subject completely to their verdict, do not be despondent if ever you fall foul of disaster; instead, expect help from God by observing his decrees and commands, being attentive to his good pleasure and not withdrawing from virtue on account of the hardships besetting you. "And he will exalt you to inherit the land": if you do this, he will shelter you, even if vulnerable to the sinner, and make you exalted by ensuring you secure occupancy of the land. "In the destruction of sinners you will see": not only will you be freed from their scheming, but also you will see them destroyed.
Psalms 39:1 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 39:2
It is a universal custom to be upset when you see your plans at the mercy of sinners, and to be upset also at your own misfortunes, especially when you are badly treated by wrongdoers while conscious of your own virtuous behavior. The general run of people react to such developments by turning to criticism and displeasure with the God of all. Hence, blessed David says, "I shall guard my ways so as not to sin with my tongue": I kept my words to myself, that is, I made a decision and judgment to guard myself against any sin.
Psalms 39:11 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 39:12c
So this is what should concern us, being rescued from sins and attaining reconciliation with you, which results in complete resolution of problems, and not taking pains over other things, which are futile and useless for the painstaker, never bringing one an outcome for the pains or providing one with lasting benefit from the pains.
Psalms 41:2 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 41:3A
He comments on God's favors to him in different ways: he will give freedom from perils, he says, will closely guard him so that he will suffer nothing, provide him with life and make him appear as blessed by the vast number of favors in the sight of everyone.
Psalms 42:8 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 42:9A
I considered further that though the impending troubles are so numerous, it is very easy for you to provide a solution; if by day you bid lovingkindness to be shown us—in other words, relief from the troubles to occur—it happens so quickly that immediately those in receipt of good things set about singing through the night and offering hymns of praise to you for what has happened. When God enjoins mercy by day, then, immediately by night "his song is with me," as if to say, So prompt will be the discharge of his command that, with his command given by day, it is possible for me to sing by night of the good things done to me.
Psalms 42:11 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 42:11C
"My personal savior is my God": I trusted that you would doubtless meet my request, since you personally are my salvation and my Lord (the term "personal savior" meaning "my support, my glory"—in other words, It is you yourself who provides me with this).
Psalms 45:4 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 45:7A
To what human being would he apply this achievement or the magnitude of what is described? To whom would he apply the verse "Your right hand will guide you in marvelous fashion" when the divine Scripture consistently says of all the righteous that it is with God's help that they acquire strength?
Psalms 45:4 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 45:5B
It is therefore clear from this that he is not speaking of a human being as king: no human being exercises such zeal for bringing about the kingdom in himself and uses weapons and all such things so as to teach gentleness to his own; on the contrary, he is concerned to gain power, and wipe out the opposition and in every way make his own people fearsome to the enemy.
Psalms 45:6 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 45:7B
Immediately he proceeded to say also "a rod of equity," which suggests correctness and justice in prosecution. Such an expression, however, seems not applicable to a human being—at least such an expression occurs nowhere in reference to a human being—whereas it is applicable to God, of whom he says also in another place, "He will judge the world in righteousness; he will judge peoples in rectitude," and elsewhere, "Good and upright is the Lord," and "Because the word of the Lord is upright."
Psalms 45:7 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 45:8B
On the one hand, he separated the natures by uttering definite statements of different ideas (there being a great difference between "Your throne, O God, is forever and ever" and "Hence, God your God anointed you"), and on the other hand, he gave a glimpse of the union by saying this of one person.
Psalms 45:8 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 45:9A
In his wish to imply both the passion and the glory of the passion he says "myrrh, resin, and cassia from your garments," suggesting by "myrrh" the passion, and by mention of "resin and cassia" implying the fragrance and splendor of the passion, as if to say, Even the passion itself, which affects your temple, will be accompanied by great fragrance and glory, with the result that the fragrance from it will spread to the whole world, as the apostle also says: "We are the fragrance of Christ among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing." Now, he did well to mention "myrrh" and associate it with the phrase "from your garments" for us to understand the divinity to be free of suffering.
Psalms 45:9 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 45:10A-C
The church is in attendance on you, he is saying, on your right; that is, it will always be assembled for you. The church is always assembled in union with him both in purpose and in the grace of rebirth, just as members and body are with the head, as the apostle says in one place, "You are the body of Christ and individually members of it." … For this reason, "at your right hand" was well put, as if to say by way of underlining the honor stemming from the more important member. [The church] is in attendance on you, enjoying the greatest honor from you.… clothed in much adornment. So while it was vouchsafed the dignity of sonship and called and made body of Christ, it was clothed in the greatest adornment, the beauty of the spiritual graces: the marvels performed through the saints were like a kind of golden and marvelous adornment, bringing splendor to the believers in Christ, who composed the church.
Psalms 45:13 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 45:14A
By "within" he refers to the mind, and the words can refer only to not bodily beauty but virtue of soul. This, in fact, is the true glory of the devout, purity of conscience, for which they will be utterly conspicuous in the judge's sight.
Psalms 46:5 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 46:6A
He was not in one part of the city and cut off from another but "in its midst," surrounding it all, protecting it all equally from the foe.
Psalms 49:8 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 49:6B-9
Sin is worse than everything; it is this that must be feared, not the possibility of being in need of money, since a person who is rich and in the grip of a multitude of sins is in real difficulty and does not find release from the troubles.… Nor can he then himself by paying money to God prevail on him to desist from punishment; nor does he succeed in redeeming his soul, weighed down as it is with sin. And so sin is worse than anything, since no one who is weighed down by it and is consequently the object of punishment by God can be freed from danger.
Psalms 49:12 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 49:13
Despite having so much enjoyment in the present life, possessing many natural advantages by comparison with other living creatures and enjoying a great number of gifts, they did not understand the greatness of the honor conferred on them by God; instead, by their insensitivity to the possession of their attributes they are no different from cattle, which possess no intelligence.… While giving little heed to thanking the giver, they live a heedless life and grow old in their sins. Thus, they also are the objects of a rigorous verdict from God.
Psalms 49:13 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 49:14A-B
He uses "this" as a demonstrative, meaning, Such behavior is responsible for their troubles, and their heedless enjoyment of God's good things inevitably brings down on them God's punishment.… Even when those forebears who were in receipt of riches suffer retribution and just punishment from God, people after them do not come to their senses; on the contrary, they are pleased with the words and actions of the others and hasten to imitate them, acting in similar fashion regarding wealth and the good things of this life, giving too little heed to virtue to be brought around by the punishment of their predecessors.
Psalms 49:15 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 49:16
God is able to pluck one from the midst of death even if it seems already to have taken hold (the phrase "from the hand of hades" meaning, Even if it has one in its grasp, it is possible and very easy for God to snatch one away).
Psalms 50:14 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 50:14A-15
Offer me this sacrifice of praise. That is, offer yourself as a victim to me, taking pains to live in thanksgiving to me and devoting yourself totally to me.… Pray always to me about everything; render me this and perform it. The phrase "pray to me about everything" means, consider me responsible for all your good things, and receive from me all that is at any time good, no one being able to pray unless persuaded of this.… It will be no idle conjecture for you, since with this attitude you will, even if calling in the midst of afflictions, be heard and will attain what you aspire to, and so will take occasion from the beneficence to give even greater glory.
Psalms 50:16 — COMMENTARY ON PSALMS 50:16
The fact, he is saying, that you take pains to read the law, mouth the words of its stipulations, and listen carefully to its being read is no excuse. It only sets me more against you, your knowing the law, listening to the commandments and putting them on your lips while in practice pursuing the opposite, the result being that the reading is useless for you. Instead, listening to me when I speak and give commands in the law is an insult to me when there is utter neglect of me in practice.
Psalms 72:5 — COMMENTARY ON ZECHARIAH 9:10-12
So that now, concerning the things to be promised to the people through the kingdom of Zerubbabel, who was assigned for this through the divine judgment, it was not at all inappropriate for the prophet, speaking, to say, "he comes righteous and saving," so that he might show that he is present with them and that he has been chosen by God for the kingship in order to do these things. It says that those very things, therefore, have successively happened concerning the people through him. But let these things suffice for the most accurate teaching. The prophet is speaking concerning Zerubbabel and prophesying present things concerning him, if also as a prophet himself he had a certain vision concerning things to come, he adds:He shall govern the waters from sea to sea And from the River to the ends of the earth. (Zech 9:10) This also has apparently been said hyperbolically, that he will prevail over many enemies and that he will occupy much territory, having given it for habitation to the Jews. The seventy-first [seventy-second] psalm by the blessed David is similar; in the form of a prayer ir it has a figure of the prosperity of Solomon, where it says, "May he live while the sun endures, and as long as the moon throughout all generations! May he have dominion from sea to sea and from the River to the ends of the earth." Is it not obvious that these things are said hyperbolically?
Psalms 72:8 — COMMENTARY ON ZECHARIAH 9:10-12
So that now, concerning the things to be promised to the people through the kingdom of Zerubbabel, who was assigned for this through the divine judgment, it was not at all inappropriate for the prophet, speaking, to say, "he comes righteous and saving," so that he might show that he is present with them and that he has been chosen by God for the kingship in order to do these things. It says that those very things, therefore, have successively happened concerning the people through him. But let these things suffice for the most accurate teaching. The prophet is speaking concerning Zerubbabel and prophesying present things concerning him, if also as a prophet himself he had a certain vision concerning things to come, he adds:He shall govern the waters from sea to sea And from the River to the ends of the earth. (Zech 9:10) This also has apparently been said hyperbolically, that he will prevail over many enemies and that he will occupy much territory, having given it for habitation to the Jews. The seventy-first [seventy-second] psalm by the blessed David is similar; in the form of a prayer ir it has a figure of the prosperity of Solomon, where it says, "May he live while the sun endures, and as long as the moon throughout all generations! May he have dominion from sea to sea and from the River to the ends of the earth." Is it not obvious that these things are said hyperbolically?
Romans 1:1 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
All things are servants of Christ, and he is Lord of all. Therefore Paul calls himself a servant first of all, thereby encouraging the rest to do likewise. He also recalls the unique lordship of the Son but not in such a way as to deny the lordship of the Father, which is confessed by everybody. In saying that he was set apart, he showed that he was not only called but also chosen from among many as useful for the preaching of the gospel.
Romans 1:7 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul says to all because with Christ everyone is equal. When he says: "to those beloved of God, called to be holy," he cuts out unbelievers. The forgiveness of sins and the gift of sonship may be what he means by "grace," and the defeat of the invisible enemies, from whom Christ has delivered us, may be what he means by "peace," as well as the refusal of the body to rebel against the reasonings of the soul and godly agreement with one another.
Romans 1:8 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
It seems that Paul begins by giving thanks in his other epistles too, thereby teaching by word and deed those to whom the letter is written that one ought to begin by thanking God, not only for one's own but also for others. But here this salutation has a special importance, because after the teaching of Peter, anyonewho wanted to teach them the doctrines of godliness had to show that he accepted Peter's teaching and was not trying to introduce them to anything which went against that. Therefore his praise of the Romans was no accident. Often in his letters he used the salutation as a way of preparing those who would be better disposed toward him as a result of such praise, for the reading of what had been written."Through Jesus Christ" had to be added here, not to qualify Christ's ministry, as it seemed to some of the heretics, but because he is the cause of our thanks. Hence the apostle says that he thanks God for them all and that Christ is the cause of his thanksgiving.
Romans 1:9 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul rightly says "with my spirit," contrasting this with the carnal worship of the Jews in circumcision and sabbatarianism and other such sacrifices, none of which is either spiritual or true. Some have pointed out that the phrase is a simpler way of saying "with my mind and with my will."
Romans 1:11 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul showed by his longing to see them that his desire was genuine, and by his eagerness to share, that the Romans' spiritual gift was not something private but that he himself would be the one who would impart it.
Romans 1:13 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul here shows quite clearly that he wanted to go to Rome but that he had often been prevented. At the same time he wants to put them in fear, lest perhaps it was because of their unworthiness that he had been prevented from going to them.
Romans 1:18 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Since the forthcoming punishment of the ungodly and unrighteous has already been decreed, it is essential to walk in the righteousness of faith, in order to avoid the evils to come. Paul rightly said that the wrath of God is being revealed … in this present age, when God restrains himself and does not render the full punishment, so as not to remove the opportunity to repent, with the result that either they will turn around and be saved or else they will turn away and have no excuse.
Romans 1:25 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
The truth about God is that he is the true God. But human beings have made idols and falsely called them gods. They have transferred the truth of God to idols. In other words, they have changed what could rightly be said and thought about God into a lie by applying it to idols instead.
Romans 2:2 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
"Judgment" means the tribunal and judgment seat of God, and as if to make the condemnation of the wicked certain Paul added "rightly."
Romans 2:12 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
So as not to appear to be condemning them out of hatred Paul has repeated himself here, saying that those who have sinned without the law will perish without the law and that those under the law will be judged by the law.
Romans 2:16 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul continually preached that there will be a day of judgment and that it will be necessary to have believed in Christ in order to escape punishment.
Romans 2:17 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
This is not to be read as a question, as some people think, but rather as a statement, as if to say: "Not as a true Jew, albeit in secret, but merely claiming to be one and making false pretenses."
Romans 2:20 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
By "embodiment" is meant not the form but the substance and the knowledge and the truth, like the one "who was in the form of God."
Romans 2:29 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
"Spiritual" here does not refer to the Holy Spirit. For Paul is not talking about those who have been put right by grace but is referring above all to those outside the faith who do the works of the law and who show themselves to be better than those transgressors who are under the law.
Romans 3:12 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul did not treat this passage as if it were prophetic but rather because what David said about transgressors was still a good summary of what was going on in Paul's day. Even now we still cite texts of this kind in our sermons, because what they say can be applied to our congregations.
Romans 3:27 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Now you say to me (says Paul), What new law has thrown the old one out? For when the ruler adds to the law, the law is changed. Paul answers: When the law of works came in it did not abolish the former law—on the contrary, it actually contained the former law. But when the law of faith appeared it did abolish the earlier law, having overcome the boasting which came from the law of works. These things have been given to us by the grace of God, which our forefathers, however hard they may have tried, were unable to obtain.
Romans 3:28 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul did not say "we hold" because he was himself uncertain. He said it in order to counter those who concluded from this that anyone who wished to could be justified simply by willing faith. Note carefully that Paul does not say simply "without the law," as if we could just perform virtue by wanting to, nor do we do the works of the law by force. We do them because we have been led to do them by Christ.
Romans 4:8 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Sinful works are not counted against the faithful. God's love of humanity is the greatest thing that has happened.
Romans 5:13 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
The coming of the law did not remove sin. On the contrary, even though the law was observed and kept by men, sin continued to increase and the law could do nothing to stop it.… So far was the law from being the cure for sin that Paul even says that there would not have been sin at all had there been no law! By "law" Paul means the discernment which comes by both the natural law and the law of Moses. For without this discernment, nobody would be able to call sin by its name, since there would be no way of knowing the difference between good and evil.
Romans 5:14 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Death came to all men not because they committed the same sin as Adam but because they sinned.… Death is not just the punishment for one particular sin; it is the punishment for every sin.
Romans 5:16 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
There is one great difference between Adam's sin and God's gift in Christ. Adam's sin brought punishment on all those who came after him, and so they died. But the free gift is different. For not only did it take effect in the case of those who came afterward; it also took away the sins of those who had gone before. It is therefore much greater, because where sin harmed those who came after, grace rescued not only those who came after but those who had transgressed before as well.
Romans 5:17 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul shows just how superior grace is to sin, because while death, which came into the world by the sin of Adam, held full sway, the enjoyment of the gift of grace through Christ has been given to us, through which we shall be raised from the dead and in righteousness cease to sin. But we have not yet received it fully; it does not yet hold full sway. We are still waiting for the life to come, even though we now enjoy it in part.
Romans 5:21 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul says that just as sin once ruled us even against our will, because we were so used to it, so now our zeal for God reigns and will reign in us forever. Since we have been made worthy of eternal life through the resurrection and live in true and certain righteousness, we shall no longer be receptive to sin.
Romans 6:14 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Having shown that they should avoid sinning for the sake of future benefits, Paul goes on to add that they should live as though they were incapable of sinning at all. For if the time was coming when they would be transformed and act as sinless people, then here and now they ought to cleanse their minds of any thought of sin and earnestly try to do what is good.
Romans 6:15 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
I think that Paul is saying this to the Jews because it is the nature of the law to tell us what we should and should not do. If we find ourselves outside the law, there is nothing to stop us from doing what we like, but if there is some way of determining what should and should not be done, then we are back under the law again, and what is said here will easily apply to us. Paul has expressed himself in this seemingly contradictory way because he is saying that since we are free of sin we are no longer under the law. He does not mean that the outpouring of grace has given us license to sin.
Romans 7:4 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
The phrase "in order that we" should be read as: "and so we shall".… For Paul wants to say that once we have been established in this life we shall bear the fruits of righteousness for God, since we have been changed from our behavior under the law.It is most remarkable that Paul says that we have died not through baptism but through the body of Christ. For Adam was the beginning of this life, and Christ is the beginning of the life to come. So, just as in this life we have everything in common with Adam, so also in the next life we shall have everything in common with Christ, beginning with his resurrection. We are said to be a part of the Lord's body because we share this with him. So just as we have been metaphorically born again by baptism, Paul says that we have become a part of Christ's body by sharing in the resurrection which is typified by baptism.
Romans 7:5 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Holy Scripture sometimes calls our human nature "flesh," and sometimes it goes beyond this and includes the concept of mortality as well.… In any case, the flesh is never said to inherit or to be capable of inheriting eternal life in the age to come.
Romans 7:6 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Now everything has changed, Paul says. We have died to this life and are no longer under any obligation to keep the law. Our life no longer has anything in common with that, because we have been renewed by the power of the Spirit and have become different people. We have crossed over from this present life to life eternal and cannot tolerate any captivity of the flesh.… What is more, we who follow Christ are much better off than those who are governed by the law.
Romans 7:7 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
We often covet the things of this life, not merely food and drink and sex but fame and fortune as well. We have these desires inside us and would never know there was anything wrong with them unless the law told us so.
Romans 7:8 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul says that without the law to define it sin would not be effective. Why? Because it is not the deed by itself which is sin but rather doing something when you know that it is wrong.
Romans 7:12 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul calls the law "holy" because it gives us the principles on which to tell the difference between good and evil, … "just" because after showing us what is good it necessarily points out the punishment for the transgressor, but also "good" because it is the source of good things, showing us what they are and persuading us that they are desirable.
Romans 7:23 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul was right to refer to his members here, because sin takes many forms according to the nature of our members. There are sins of the eyes, sins of the tongue, sins of other parts of the body as well.
Romans 8:2 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
The apostle says that the resurrection takes place by the working of the Spirit. … Paul calls the Spirit the "Spirit of life" because the Spirit is the firstfruits of the eternal life which we shall then enjoy. The Spirit has been given to us in the hope of immortality, and faith in Christ has permitted us to enjoy him, because he has set us free from death and sin. Clearly Paul is using the things which are to come as evidence for what has been promised to us in Christ.
Romans 8:14 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
It is clear that these people will live the blessed life with their Father.
Romans 8:15 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
The text should be read like this: "You have not received the Spirit; instead you are again in fear of slavery." … The slavery in question is slavery to the law.
Romans 8:19 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul is referring here to the resurrection on the last day.
Romans 8:22 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
How did the whole creation suffer this? The invisible creatures did it by thinking and feeling; the visible creatures did it by sharing in the thing itself.
Romans 8:28 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
We must not worry if we find that things which we expect to turn out for our good are unexpectedly evil in the present life, because we know that in the end everything works together for good for those who love God.
Romans 9:20 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
How can the thing which is made blame its Maker for the construction of its own nature? Everything must be content with its own nature, whatever that may be.
Romans 9:21 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Whoever heard of a clay pot made for menial use blaming the potter for the way it was made and demanding to be remolded for some better purpose?
Romans 9:22 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
What Paul is saying is this: God has made this present life one of struggles and not of reward, and he agrees that wicked men and good ones alike will be tested in both good and bad things in order to have an exact touchstone for the predestination of each person. In this way those who are good will follow the path of virtue and will cling to it through all the changes of life, neither boasting in the good times nor being unable to bear reverses. Wicked people, on the other hand, will in all circumstances be shown to be lovers of evil, ignorant of the reason for their good fortune when they enjoy it and exaggerating the wretchedness of their condition when they suffer grief. God gives each of these what they deserve in the next life.
Romans 9:32 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
It is impossible to be justified by the works of the law because it would be necessary to keep the whole law, which is not possible. But anyone who sins (which is inevitable) lies under the judgment of the law.
Romans 10:15 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
If the heralds of these things are deemed worthy of such great admiration, how essential and how advantageous a thing the teaching of the apostles must be.
Romans 10:16 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
The first part of this [verse] ought to be read as a question to which the second part is the apostle's answer.… There is nothing surprising about this, for Isaiah also testifies to the small number of believers.
Romans 10:17 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
It is perfectly clear to us, says Paul, following the voice of the prophet and what we have said, that there can be no faith without teaching, and the teaching of godliness is impossible unless it shows the truth about God.
Romans 10:18 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
It is clear that Paul did not put this here as a kind of prophecy but rather as a statement of what was actually going on at the time.
Romans 11:1 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul has mentioned not only his first ancestor but also the head of his tribe in order to show that he is not fabricating his claim.
Romans 11:9 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul is using these words not as a prophecy but as a statement from the Scriptures which backs up what he has already said about the Jews, and at the same time he shows that there is nothing new under the sun.
Romans 11:16 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
By "first fruits" Paul means Christ, because he was selected out of the entire race of the Jews; by "root" he means Abraham, from whom the race descended.
Romans 11:22 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul is telling us that we ought to learn from both these things and consider how great God's love for us is, that we should have been counted worthy through faith. We ought to become ever more eager to live a godly life bearing in mind how God rejected them because of their unbelief and do everything in our power not to fall in the same way.
Romans 12:13 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul says that it is right for us always to remember the saints, to regard their needs as our own, and thus to lighten their suffering.
Romans 13:7 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
"Taxes" refers to property taxes; "revenue" refers to sales taxes.
Romans 13:9 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Every law either forbids evil or tells us to do good. Legislators pass the first kind of law in order that we should not harm one another and the second kind in order that we should help one another as far as possible. But they are all summed up in the one command that we should love our neighbor.
Romans 13:11 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
"Our salvation" means the general resurrection on the last day, for it is then that we shall enjoy true salvation.
Romans 13:12 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
By "day" Paul means the time since the coming of Christ, for his appearing has made it much easier to tell the difference between good and evil. "Night" refers to the time before his coming.
Romans 13:14 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul wants to say that by the regeneration of baptism we have been conformed to Christ and become members of the one body of the church, of which he is the head, and so we must put him on in the understanding of what we are expecting, in that we hope to share in his resurrection.
Romans 14:8 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
If we live, it is Christ's life that we live; if we die, we die with him, under his custody.
Romans 14:10 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
"Why do you pass judgment on your brother?" was said to the Jews. "Why do you despise your brother?" was said to the Gentiles. Neither of you should do either, says Paul, because you are under obligation to maintain Christ's standards of behavior in your life.
Romans 14:13 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul is saying this to the Gentiles, even if it appears that he is speaking to the Jews.… For the Gentiles at Rome were doing many things deliberately in order to upset the Jews, partly because they were the majority in the church and partly because they were of a higher social class.
Romans 14:17 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
We ought to laugh at those who think that after the resurrection we shall eat and drink, when Paul's words so clearly say the opposite.
Romans 15:1 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Once again, Paul is speaking to the Gentiles, who looked down on the Jews because they kept the law.
Romans 15:15 — PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH
Paul is telling them that he has not received anything new or wonderful which he is writing to teach them. Rather, he is just reminding them of things they have already learned.
Song of Songs 1:5 — PARAPHRASE OF THE COMMENTARY OF THEODORE OF MOPSUESTIA
[Solomon] took Pharaoh's daughter as his wife. But … she was dark, as all the Egyptian and Ethiopian women are.… The Hebrews and their beautiful wives, and the other princesses as well, ridiculed her on account of her unseemliness, her small height and her dark complexion. To avoid any irritation on her part and so that no hostility would result between him and the Pharaoh, Solomon exclusively built for her a house of valuable stones [and decorated it] with gold and silver. During the meals he chanted [the Song of Songs] in her presence in order to honor her, and he made known with it that she was dark yet beautiful and loved by him.
Titus 1:5 — COMMENTARY ON TITUS
Paul emphasizes that correct teaching must accompany these ordinations. He mentions only presbyters, since theirs is the most general office.
Titus 1:6 — COMMENTARY ON TITUS
Paul does not measure the virtue of fathers by the depravity of their children, nor did the misbehavior of his sons make Samuel unworthy of the priesthood; Paul wishes only to show the likely intentions of the father from what has been created in the sons.
Titus 1:7 — COMMENTARY ON TITUS
Paul here shows that at this time "elders" and "bishops" were interchangeable and that some were put in charge of towns, some of whole regions. These latter became the bishops of later times.
Titus 1:12 — Commentary on Titus
Having criticized the dangers that arise from Christians of Jewish background, Paul now does the same with Gentile believers. "Of their own" does not refer to the Jews but to a poet or prophet of Gentile background, even one of the Cretans. He wished to criticize the Cretans because they believed they could show the tomb of Jove, even though Jove existed not as a man (as the poet thought) but as a god.
Titus 2:3 — COMMENTARY ON TITUS
These are elders in age only, though some have taken the position that the women held an office analogous to that of male presbyters.
Zechariah 1:8 — COMMENTARY ON ZECHARIAH 1:7-10
It is quite clear that all the things shown to the prophet were tokens of certain realities, just as Joseph saw sheaves, sun, moon and stars, each of which carried a clue to some coming event, and the Pharaoh saw ears of corn and oxen, some fat and some skinny, and by these as well other events were signified from what was shown. In exactly the same way the prophet also sees these things by divine revelation, and each of the things shown him contained some sign or indication of a reality. Likewise blessed Peter also saw a cloth let down from heaven, full of various living creatures clean and unclean, and the vision contained a clue to some other things.
Zechariah 8:23 — COMMENTARY ON ZECHARIAH 8:20-23
God will make the return of the remainder so conspicuous that many people who are from different nations and have shared that calamity will perceive God's care for the people. They will lay hold of any one of them and use him as a guide for a return to Jerusalem, since everyone is sufficiently stirred up to that end from the clear realization that God is with them on the basis of the incredible deeds done for them. The phrase "ten men," note, here too refers not to number but has the meaning of many.
Zechariah 9:10 — COMMENTARY ON ZECHARIAH 9:8-10
Be glad, therefore, O Jerusalem, since of such a kind is a king appointed for you by God, and he has come to you, capable of saving his own on account of the divine influence accruing to him and justly inflicting total punishment on the adversaries. While he is riding a lowly animal for the reason that he has just arrived back from captivity, he assumes great power through divine grace, and so from Ephraim and from Jerusalem he will remove all the chariots of the adversaries, every war horse and every battle bow—that is to say, he will drive off all enemies so that there will be no longer any adversary against the country of Judah. He will also wipe out a great multitude of the adversaries and completely deprive them of peace, crushed and destroyed in a war waged by him.
Zephaniah 3:1-2 — COMMENTARY ON ZEPHANIAH 3:1-2
[Jerusalem] was like this for refusing to the end to hear the word of the prophet sent to it and not accepting in any way the instruction from that source. Though seeming to undergo a change for a while, once more it went back to its characteristic wickedness; at any rate, it took no account of God's sending the prophet, nor did it make the decision to pay attention to him later, despite having such a remarkable experience. On the contrary, it forsook him completely and declared war on him, attacking Jerusalem after the annihilation of the ten tribes, the city in which the temple of God was to be found.
Zephaniah 3:14-15 — COMMENTARY ON ZEPHANIAH 3:11-15
Live now in utter delight, O Jerusalem, living in complete happiness and satisfaction; for God has removed all your lawless deeds and of necessity has rescued you from the power of the foe, to whom you were subjected in paying the penalty of punishment. The Lord will now be in your midst, showing his kingship by his care for you, so that trouble will no longer be able to approach you.